Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- From: "John Slade" <hitman86@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:13:28 -0700
"Edwin" <thorne25@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151617479.191328.226080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George Graves wrote:
After a week of using XP Pro at my newest client's place of business, I
have to be honest and say that I was wrong. XP is nowhere near as
unusable as my previous brief encounters with it had led me to believe.
It is, in fact, very usable. [snip of George's left hand taking away what
his right hand just gave us]
Just my two cents and an apology to the Windows users here for many of
my comments about Windows. I still think OSX is MUCH better, but XP is
hardly the garbage that Win98/SE/ME/W2K was or that I thought XP to
still be.
Never mind apologizing for what you said about Windows XP.
How about apologizing for all the insults you gave people for trying to
make you see what you've finally realized about Windows XP?
I just read his apology in another users post. I don't think an apology
is really needed. But anyway Graves is now unplonked.
John
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by Date: Re: Maine signs $41 M contract with Apple for laptops
- Previous by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Next by thread: Re: XP Professional: Not as bad as I expected, but still VERY primitive
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
