Re: Sandman Explained

In article <tl1n92p0uofs4k556g6nnsu3k2118ihe3o@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:51:40 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <rnum92lt2ke7stb3vahgcp6p70dve9nf3s@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:27:07 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <7qhi921ih23h8pdm5onc3lqrigfaukk77c@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:03:41 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
chose to bless us with the following wisdom:

In article <fi2h92tbbudkrq4712jd2377ihvjjk6vk1@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/20062006/2/ztechnology-digital-age-illiter
ate
s-1
-3-
european-adults-lack-basic.html

Having dealt with Europeans I can't say that I'm surprised.



Cuss and discuss.

LOL

Sandman runs his own webhosting company...

And yet something braindead simple like networking Windows totally
eludes him. I hope he pays his tech guys well. He sure as hell isn't
doing that work.

So no problem a user encounters with Windows is ever the fault of
Windows, is that right?

And once again we see Alan reaching out to grab absurdities off the
shelf that were not present in the posting.

Or is it just right when you want to toss around
insults?

Its just when Sandman confesses to posting nonsense in order to make
Windows look bad. He's had the situation explained to him and been
given the solution. All he replies with is 'It didn't work.' If this
were the first time he'd done this he might have some credibility.
However since this is a regular game with him, and if his Windows
machines really had all the problems he claims they do they wouldn't
even run, I'm feeling pretty good calling bullshit on him.

He confessed to no such thing. He had problems, he reported them.

Do you have a contract with someone that contains a clause stipulating
that must always be wrong?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bad6d3edc70fdbb4?dmod
e=source&hl=en

It says nothing about posting anything that could be construed as
"nonsense". It only says that he wasn't making the post hoping to find a
solution from the likes of you.

And no surprise, you didn't fail to live down to his low expectations.



And his credibility far outstrips yours.

Among braindead Maccies who will believe anything another braindead
Maccie says and deny anything said by a non-Maccie.
.

Relevant Pages