Re: Global warming hoax
- From: Timberwoof <timberwoof.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:03:10 -0700
In article <h8adnSy7No2RvRLZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
GreyCloud <mist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
In article <2eGdnT6bzdmQYBDZnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
GreyCloud <mist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lars Träger wrote:
GreyCloud <mist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Timberwoof wrote:
Just because he taught other scientists doesn't mean that his theories
are now all correct. It could be that his students built on his work,
modified his theories to fit new data, and came up with new theories.
Besides, "He mentored a lot of other scientists" is just an appeal to
authority. It des not address the truth of what he's saying.
And neither does it mean that the rest of the scientists that agree with
GW are correct. Don't forget that CO2 is heavier than air. So how does
it get up high to cause a warming blanket around the planet?
So who is the idiot pooring out all the CO2 over top of Mauna Loa?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CO2_data_mlo.png
Thermal air currents. But then I bet your computer model didn't take
that into account.
No computer models here, gaseous-brain. That graph shows measurements.
Well, woof-biscuit,
You can call me that if you want to, but I won't respect you in the
morning.
can you interpret what you were looking at??
Between 1960 and 2005 the concentration of CO2 at Mauna Loa observatory
increased from 315 ppm to 380 ppm. Aside from annual variations
attributable to changes in plant chemistry during summer and winter, the
concentration increased fairly steadily throughout all that time.
Most likely not.
I predict that whatever interpretation I give, you will find fault with
it. The closer I am to your estimation of correct, the more isulting
your response will be.
But then, how come they can't predict the weather
properly?
This is actually pretty trivial to answer: There is no way to gather up
enough data about the current state of the weather to make accurate
predictions beyond a few days into the future.
Guffaw!!!
Yeah. How come you didn't know that? I'll bet you think that problems
making short-term weather predictions make it impossible to make any
long-term climate predictions. Which begs the question of whether you
know the difference between climate and weather.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Global warming hoax
- References:
- Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: Lars Träger
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: Lars Träger
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: Timberwoof
- Re: Global warming hoax
- From: GreyCloud
- Global warming hoax
- Prev by Date: Re: Is the Mac a PC?
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Climate Change Is Going TO Kill Us All...
- Previous by thread: Re: Global warming hoax
- Next by thread: Re: Global warming hoax
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|