Re: Why Its Pointless To Argue With Global Warming Believers

In article <jJWdnc-6spVmShzZRVn-jg@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
GreyCloud <mist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

George Graves wrote:

In article <1hgd742.1je89e3xn3v7kN%Lars.Traeger@xxxxxxxx>,
Lars.Traeger@xxxxxxxx (Lars Träger) wrote:


George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Less people = less pollutants. That doesn't make any sense?

USA = less people, China = less polution.

Things make less sense when the USA is involved.


What makes you think that I'm excluding the USA? We need to trim our
population back to about 150 million (about half) just like the rest of
the world.


As long as kids keep hopping into bed, the population will continue to
rise.

Kids hopping into bed together is not so much the problem as are the
puritanical sexual mores which keep these kids from freely obtaining
contraceptives or being able to have free access to abortions when
"accidents" happen.

The only remaining question will be when will the system collapse
on itself?

Its entropic. The quality of life deteriorates a little each year and
people don't tend to notice it so much. Some even delude themselves that
increasing population and eroding life quality and freedoms is a GOOD
thing.

--
George Graves
The health of our society is a direct result of the men
and women we choose to admire.
.