Re: Vista complaints
- From: "Super Spinner" <Pepe.Smythe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 May 2006 17:05:31 -0700
Lars Träger wrote:
Super Spinner <Pepe.Smythe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lars Träger wrote:
Exactly, they should post those as replies to the "Longhorn will be so
great when it comes out in 2003" posts made by Wintrolls long forgotten
(or who have changed names so often they've forgotten it was them).
Anyone who thought that Longhorn would really be released in 2003 is
either an idiot or an anti-MS fanboy creating unrealistic expectations
so as to bash MS. XP was released in late 2001. You think Longhorn
would be released just two years later? (Longhorn wasn't just the
typical OSX 0.1 incremental upgrade, and even those take 12-18 months
to be released).
So you admit that Microsoft lied. Good, you are on your way to recovery.
I couldn't care less about some unrealistic roadmap that Microsoft put
out.
BTW, Longhorn IS an intermediate release to Windows XP before the actual
successor to XP, codenamed 'Blackcomb' will be released in early 2004,
if all things go well.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/07/27/microsoft_reshuffles_windows_roa
dmap_full/
Vista's not a *major* upgrade, but IMO it's like going from OSX 10.1 to
10.4. Apple went form 10.1 to 10.4 faster than Microsoft is going from
XP to Vista, but you have to remember that during the same time
Microsoft spent time on XP SP2, XP 64, Windows Server 2003, Windows MCE
2005, TabletPC, Windows Mobile (and the other WinCE stuff), XP
Embedded, and .NET 2.0. All of those OS products had updates
(sometimes multiple updates) from the time that XP was released up to
today. Only Longhorn/Vista itself was delayed, and that's largely
because of Microsoft's screwed up development process (which they've
publicly admitted) which caused them to start over in 2004 using
Windows Server 2003 as the base rather than XP (and yet XP work still
continued to get XP SP2 out the door). It's not like Microsoft was
doing nothing wrt their OS products during all this time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Lars Träger
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Mitch
- Re: Vista complaints
- References:
- NEWS: Vista complaints
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: John Slade
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Alan Baker
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: zara
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Derek Currie
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Lars Träger
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Super Spinner
- Re: Vista complaints
- From: Lars Träger
- NEWS: Vista complaints
- Prev by Date: Re: Damn I'm Good!
- Next by Date: Re: Maccies aren't fanatical?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista complaints
- Next by thread: Re: Vista complaints
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|