Re: Maccies aren't fanatical? (by the way, what is a "Maccie?)

In article <beif721fb6264s90np7c8ksl3ifhphjplv@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

(snip)

No one has made the assertion that all Maccies made threats. That's
something you manufactured.

Stop your crap, Clyde. Josh's title unquestionably implies that
"Maccies" are "fanatical"... as in, "fanatical" is what the word
"Maccie" means. If you refuse to define it further, don't... but his
implication is clear to anyone with a hint of intelligence.


This makes sense to you?

No your lying and twisting do not make sense to me. But it does seem
to be the entirety of your argument so it must make sense to you.

You're the one doing the lying and twisting here.

I
fail to see how it can considering that no one using the term will step
forward and define it.

Once again we see Steve feigning ignorance because he has nothing else
except his faux definition of the term.

What we see is you tap dancing.



What were the nature of the threats?

WTF does that matter? Is 'I'm going to beat you with a pipe' somehow more
understandable to you than 'I'm going to strangle you and your girlfriend
with your small intestines'?

My point is... *he* is calling them threats, we may not.

LOL! So now you need a transcript of his emails and phone calls?


Snit writes all kinds of 'victim' bull*** every single day.


You're a joke, Steve. By your standard we can't accept anything we
see. Maybe there's 10 million Mac viruses. All we have that there's
not is several articles and posting stating that. Maybe they don't
call them viruses but maybe others would.


Where is the connection that *all* Maccies are fanatical as suggested by
Josh's title?

This is nowhere but in your own mind...such as it is.


No, I see no connection at all... not even in my mind... and certainly
not one any of the people using the term "Maccie" have made.


See, unless a "Maccie" is a person fanatical enough to
deliver a death threat (as per your earlier reference)

Again, this is something that exists nowhere but in whatever is left of
your mind.

No, Mayor... that's the only description you have attached thus far.
Until you change it, you're stuck with it.

Typical Steve. You make up a definition


I didn't make up a thing... I used the only words you appeared willing
to give to define it.

to a word that you damn well
know the definition of, say that everyone uses that as the definition
and then declare victory through proclamation when your target says
that you're wrong. Its 'the 9th century definition of wife is still
valid' all over again. If you weren't so tedious and predictable you'd
be fun to play with. I guess Snit has a higher tolerance for that sort
of thing since he has you tied in knots almost every day.


than this thread means nothing to anyone in this NG unless you can show
a
connection with
a person engaging in death threat or hate mail activities.


Can you prove that no one in here hasn't?

No... and I can't prove you're not gonna have sex with a bullfrog
tonight, either.

Please leave me out of your sexual fantasies.

Hear that point sail over you head?


As per your standards, if there isn't 100%
incontrovertible proof attached to something we should
assume its a lie.


Horse***. I even asked how many threats the guy received above (thereby
stipulating that possibly he's telling the truth or, at least, believes
he is)... you posted a ridiculous reply. Josh's implication is that
*all* "Maccies" are fanatics. Being that no one in this thread can
define what a "Maccie" is, including the thread's creator, this thread
is essentially meaningless.

You've constantly accused the guy of lying without even a shred of
evidence to back it up.


Bull***. I simply raised the issue that I don't *know* whether he is
lying or not... and the fact is... *neither* do you or Josh... but that
doesn't stop you from using things not in evidence to make some case
about "Maccies".

You've made wild specualtions about the 'true'
source of the threats and you've constantly misrepresented what Josh
said in the first place. There's no honesty ion your whole argument.
The only 'meaning' this thread has is to see how far we can jerk you
around.

Yes, it was was evident from the start that this was nothing but a troll.

--
Not only do I lie about what others are claiming, I show evidence from the
records. - Snif
Even in the U.S., even in a court room, a lack of proof is not a
refutation. - Snif
I seriously wanted to be carted away. I need help. I now see that. - Snif
.