Re: New Patch Fixes 43 Flaws In OS X, Many Serious

Josh McKee wrote:

In article <0001HW.C08BEF1F00016E48F0407530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tim Murray <no-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On May 13, 2006, Snit wrote:

Do you have any example of someone actually claiming that OS X is resistant
to security issues? If not, Josh, why did you claim what you did?

Actually, I did: It's my contention that OS X is more resistant and resilient than Windows.


How?


If you don't know that, then you really shouldn't be asking.
windows viruses: 114,000+ OS X viruses: 0
Speaks for itself.


--
Where are we going?
And why am I in this handbasket?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Damn Im Good!
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... Windows security. ... You are the only one here that is looking foolish about windows ... Tough problem for the Windows using crowd, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Damn Im Good!
    ... Steve Carroll wrote: ... Josh McKee wrote: ... Windows security. ... You are the only one here that is looking foolish about windows ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Mac Uncracked and Unhacked after 38 Hours--Challenge
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... safely running for 38 hours since Monday morning. ... Josh claims to have issued his challenge on Slashdot and Zdnet. ... "It's also worth noting a piece that says all the security news is much ado ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Damn Im Good!
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... Steve Carroll wrote: ... Windows security. ... You are the only one here that is looking foolish about windows ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Damn Im Good!
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... Steve Carroll wrote: ... You are the only one here that is looking foolish about windows security. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Quantcast