Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: not_in_use@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Hayes)
- Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:03:08 +0100
Mike <abc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1hex1d2.17pnoyxx540m2N%not_in_use@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
not_in_use@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Hayes) wrote:
Mike <abc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<derekcurrie-DB5A80.13365903052006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Derek Currie <derekcurrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But I fully believe that M$ will stick to this last delayed schedule and
dump out what they have left of what was once called Long Horn and foist
it on the public as a completed project when in fact it is NOT.
You mean like OS X 10.0?
OS X 10.0 was V1 of a whole new OS. What's Vista but XP with a dirty
great sidebar? It's not even got the fancy new file system promised in
Longhorn.
OS X 10.0 was NextStep with a new GUI, and some new APIs. It was not
a "whole new OS".
Taking that to its logical conclusion, Vista is CP/M with a new GUI and
some new APIs.
--
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: GreyCloud
- Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- References:
- More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: Jim Polaski
- Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: C Lund
- Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: Derek Currie
- Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- From: Peter Hayes
- More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- Prev by Date: Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- Next by Date: Re: Mac Mini Core Duo Upgrade Guide
- Previous by thread: Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- Next by thread: Re: More Bad news...M$ to delay Vista further?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|