Re: I don't get it

Snit wrote:
"Elizabot v2.0.3" <Elizabot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
123meqm9khvcd81@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 4/10/06 10:14 PM:

Here is what you cowardly and dishonestly snipped and ran from.

Here is what you cowardly and dishonestly snipped and ran from. Again!


Here is what you snipped and ran from:


Do you have any support for this
implication?

I am not responsible that you incorrectly inferred something from what I wrote. I made some simple statements:

"What I find more entertaining is that he didn't host it from his cableone account. Do you wonder why that is?"

Are you claiming that someone else created the image? It seems that is what you are implying with your commentary.

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my point. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

You did not post it to your site, either. Sandman did not
post it to his site. So? What is your point?

Are you suggesting that you posted a link to someone else's work, and failed to mention the source of said "artwork"?

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my point. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

Who do you think you are fooling with your idiotic trolling?

Have you stopped fellating any of the Steve Carroll's you comment about?

What?

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my question. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

If it is not my image why would I re-host someone else's image that was
already hosted?
I didn't claim it was someone else's image, now, did I?

You implied it was my image.

Nope. I wrote "What I find more entertaining is that he didn't host it from his cableone account. Do you wonder why that is?"

It is quite clear that I was asking a question about why you did not host the image on your site.

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my point. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

Clearly it was taken from my image, but what
makes you think the one posted to image shack was mine?

What makes you think that I would think that?

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my question. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

What would the point be in this case?
What case?

The one you are failing to make.

I did not make any commentary about who was responsible for the image. In fact, I asked a question about it's origins.

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my point. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

I've answered your questions, and I am now asking you a question. Why
are you responding to my every post?
Why ask me questions if you do not want a response?

What?

WHY ASK ME QUESTIONS IF YOU DO NOT WANT A RESPONSE?

Did yelling help you to hear it?


What?

Note: Snit is incapable of understanding my question. He is *that* stupid.

Still no response.

Still no response.

I wrote "he didn't host it from his cableone account."
Which implies I posted it at all.
How so?

Assuming I did not post it at all, why would it matter that I did not post
it in one particular place.

Your logic lessons did you no good. Too bad, find another teacher - I
reject you as a student. I simply will not explain the basic and simple
concepts to you. One: you are an obsessive whacko who stalks me, and two, I
have no reason to think you have the capacity to understand.

Stop begging for my attention.

Not only have you utterly failed to understand that I never claimed that you created the image in question, you dishonestly snipped and ran from my clarifications about what I had written, and the further questions about the origins of the image that you posted a link to. You have made it quite clear that you are nothing but an ugly, bitter, angry little troll with extremely poor reading comprehension.

Note: No response.

Still no response.

The only decent thing about your post is that you wrote nothing about sex, incest, rape, or any of the other perversions you are constantly obsessing over, and for that, I thank you.


I withdraw the above paragraph, as you obsessively and predictably, I might add, brought up your dishonest and disgusting lies about me again below.


Stop begging for my attention. Stop asking me to educate you about simple
logic. I have no desire to have you as a student.

Do you deny starting a new thread in order to get my attention??? Are you that stupid? Do you really think no one sees how you are constantly crying wolf?

LMAO!

Still no response.

Call it snipping and running if you like, but your obsession with me
disqualifies you from my caring.

-----
Elizabeth
1) She is just obsessive whacko whose obsession has been very, very well
documented: <http://snipurl.com/elizabeths_obsession>. Elizabeth
has made it clear not even she has a reasoned defense for her
obvious obsession, though she has made failed attempts to try to
obfuscate this fact. She has never been able to explain why she felt
the need to:
* beg to be a part of my family planning discussions
* obsessively track down information about my parents and child
* dig through my employer's website
* begged me repeatedly to tell you how "incest" made me feel
* repeatedly spoke of your fantasies of my calling you (maybe that is
what Steve means when he talks about me contacting his "wife")
* shared your fantasies about "rejecting" me
* threatened to make false allegations to the police about me
* have taken at least one image from my site and have made repulsive
comments about others
* have talked about knowing where I live and having neighbors watch me
* have talked about your rape fantasizes involving me
2) Recently Elizabeth pointed to a "Steve Carroll" in another group using
a different IP than CSMA's Steve Carroll and tried to pass them off as
on and the same in my challenge to see if anyone could find a
non-trolling post by Steve.
-----
Your claims above have nothing to do with the issue in this thread.

Your obsession is the reason you follow me around begging me to give you
lessons in logic. Bug off.

Your claims above have nothing to do with the issue in this thread.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I dont get it
    ... Have you stopped fellating any of the Steve Carroll's you comment about? ... are you responding to my every post? ... She is just obsessive whacko whose obsession has been very, ... repeatedly spoke of your fantasies of my calling you (maybe that is ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: I dont get it
    ... Have you stopped fellating any of the Steve Carroll's you comment about? ... stupid. ... are you responding to my every post? ... She is just obsessive whacko whose obsession has been very, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: Steve Carrolls still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
    ... posts from Steve and Steve responded to non-troll posts from yourself. ... In most of Steve's posts he is not responding to *any* posts ... entered the discussion "defending" Jesus. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: Steve Carrolls still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
    ... Snit wrote: ... posts from Steve and Steve responded to non-troll posts from yourself. ... In most of Steve's posts he is not responding to *any* posts ... entered the discussion "defending" Jesus. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT: Steve Carrolls still a Douche Bag (in case you missed it)
    ... Snit wrote: ... Your argument hinges on the presumption that Jesus responded to troll ... posts from Steve and Steve responded to non-troll posts from ... In most of Steve's posts he is not responding to *any* ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)