Re: One thing about Spotlight that truly SUCKS.

Tim Crowley wrote:
Curieux wrote:
Tim Crowley wrote:

So, you want to talk after all?

OK.

But my addy is fine! (This is Usenet and if you have a personal bitch with me, it would be best to keep it personal.)

Or, since you seem to be kinda thick:
_You will not hear from me again Sandman_
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Door?
I wrote:
_You will not hear from me again Sandman_

And your name is...not....Sandman?

No, this is Usenet - not email.

I'm glad someone told you.

Now you realize why I was surprised that you responded (with an ambush) to a comment which was directed to (and only to) Sandman.

Out of all the peeps in this group, I indicated who I intended to ignore. (Not Tim)
Yep, even on Usenet it is possible to decipher if one person is selecting another. Tim, Usenet or not - - you are not Sandman.

I'm fairly certain no one in the group doubts I am responding to a note from *you*
They shouldn't ambush you or me.

Usenet is neither e-mail nor anarchy.

[I checked - - - No doors here, Tim]

But if you're Sandman's posse (or patsy) I'll try and avoid you.
Hey, I have!
*You* swooped on me out of nowhere. Not cool, Tim.

I was just hoping you were really leaving.

First, that's twisted..I'll get to that..

Tim, this is Usenet - - not e-mail, not your plantation.
But, you want me to leave & ganging up on me was justified?
Remember: I had no bitch w/you & I merely told Sandman I'd tuned him out.

Tim, don't put words in my mouth.
I said nothing about leaving, really leaving & the person I did say would not hear from me was... 3-2-1
You got it: Sandman.
(Not Tim)

Don't explain why you're required to "me-too" for Sandman.
It looks tawdry enough that you ambushed me.

hahahhaha, I coulda bet $100 you were going no where.

You should have bet more.
I didn't say I was going anywhere.
Remember?
_You will not hear from me again Sandman_

(You are not Sandman, I did not e-mail you)

Hint: This is Usenet, not e-mail.

hint: this is
Usenet NOT email.

Not e-mail, not your plantation.

Are you a ringer for M$?
Are you trying screw up the 'advocacy thing'?
1. This group is to 'advocate the Mac OS'. (I hope I'm not stretching the point)
2. I owned PC's since the beginning - I only bought my first Mac last Autumn and I brag about it.
3. I asked but a few question (how to improve my machine) and only tagged Sandman for his whining about Spotlight.
However:
I'm assailed with the 'T' word and you want me to leave?

I do understand 'advocacy' - - I'm doin' it!
Plus, I switched sides, I'm happy with my machine as well as defending Spotlight.
...And you were hoping I was leaving.

Tim, M$ would be most proud of your advocacy!

Michael




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: dentalcom.net - smd gateway
    ... Tim Dixon Wrote: ... I can't comment on your questions to Amatus, ... but rather the system of UseNet. ... Sue ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: One thing about Spotlight that truly SUCKS.
    ... to a comment which was directed to Sandman. ... You don't understand Usenet. ... "Tim, you're a fuckwad". ... You learned that if you talk trash to me in public, do not expect me to 'send you an e-mail' as a response. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: bust the writers union
    ... I'm normally a nice fellow but Usenet ... Sadly too many discussions are of the type Tim Adams and I are having now. ... More snit dishonesty at it's best. ... You clearly stated people with Intel Mac's cannot install Windows. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: What a Surprise!
    ... I'd say that Tim Morrow and some of the others in that crew, ... I don't write usenet checks that I ...
    (rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Exercise in finding truth
    ... Now, Sandman, care to explain yourself - or will you just tell me that the ... As I have noted, Tim, you have a very ... it is merely my "feeling". ... Snit - talks about how the folks at individual.net helped me track ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Loading