Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund <clund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:42:22 +0100
In article <jtmckee-346904.17142707032006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <clund-F60083.11265607032006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
C Lund <clund@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol. Yet you do not extend this ability to the "Wintrolls". In this veryNot to mention all the screenshots and articles written about it.Yet you base your opinion of the current version off of an obsoleteOf course not. After all, I haven't used any kind of windows sinceof any kind.So one must have "hands-on" experience with a machine to have an
opinion
about it?
win98.
version.
thread you just said:
"Because (unlike most wintrolls WRT the mac) I've actually used older
versions of Windows."
You insist that "Wintrolls" use a Mac before they form their opinion
about the Macintosh
Or at least have some knowledge of it.
"Real-life complaints from colleagues and relatives stuck with WindowsName one such myth.But the wintrolls in here - they're just making up stuff orYou're the one making stuff up and perpetuating old myths about Windows.
perpetuating old myths that simply aren't true.
are all the justification I need to refer to Windows as "unreliable" or
"unstable"."
Windows XP is leaps and bounds more stable than Windows 98.
So I hear. But then that doesn't take much.
I'll agree
with you that Windows 98 was unstable. But Windows XP is not Windows 98.
That is also my impression.
"You have this habit of reading things that support your point of viewAnd yet I had no trouble finding articles that more or less agreedBut not you...at least not when it comes to the current (current beingThe difference being that most maccies have experience with both OSes.Except it isn't. Wintrolls find one or two examples of badMac zealots do exactly the same thing all the time.
experiences
and somehow portray this as being the typical experience.
defined as at least 4 1/2 years old) version of Windows.
with me.
and ignore what contradicts it."
Just like you do.
Josh
--
C Lund, www.notam02.no/~clund
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- References:
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Donald L McDaniel
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: C Lund
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- From: Josh McKee
- Re: Vista - stillborn?
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft Publisher...
- Next by Date: Re: Vista - stillborn?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista - stillborn?
- Next by thread: Re: Vista - stillborn?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|