Re: Adobe: Native Mactel apps years away... New Macs perform poorly

In article <RZCdneW9St8hH3_eRVn-hA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"MuahMan" <muahman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I would like to go on record as saying:

Below is the first time in the history of CSMA that George Graves has ever
been correct about anything. Ever.

Well, its certainly not the first time in history that Pratt has been
100% wrong. I wrote NONE of the below.

Lets give him a round of applause as he called that.

See, so i got the top of the line PowerBook for $500 off and it's their best
product. I'm glad I got one of the last ones, shitty powerbrick be-damned.

"Stew" <antwun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p7v4u1hhqoc64afv93lgekknrgrndlvi1v@xxxxxxxxxx
"Adobe today said it would not deliver native Intel versions of
currently shipping professional products and that customers would have
to wait until future major releases for native Intel Mac support.
Adobe declined to provide specific release dates but pointed to its
"consistent track record of releasing significant upgrades" every 18
to 24 months."

"Adobe confirmed virtually all of its applications run under Apple's
Rosetta emulation environment, it said that customers would experience
problems as well as a noticeable performance gap. Instead of
experiencing much-anticipated speed enhancements, customers are likely
to see degradation of performance."

"Professional customers will only be able to turn to Adobe's online
support resources for any questions or problems running its
applications under Rosetta, as the company says it "may not be able to
address installation or compatibility issues that arise from running
under Rosetta."


http://www.macnn.com

What's a Mac without Photoshop? I mean that's one of the few useful
apps they run. lol

--
George Graves
The health of our society is a direct result of the men
and women we choose to admire.
.

Loading