Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- From: Jim Polaski <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:57:45 -0600
In article <4d%sf.72696$k76.21482@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"zara" <zspook@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:jpolaski-63C647.15412729122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <ce-dnQH72YBotyneRVn-iw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "MuahMan" <muahman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:jpolaski-9A78E2.11481929122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > According to this article a "Fully Patched" system can be hit.
> >> >
> >> > From PC WORLD(that Mac-biased media source )
> >> >
> >> > http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,124094,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp
> >> >
> >> > Malicious Hackers Exploit Windows Flaw
> >> >
> >> > Fully patched Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 systems may be
> >> > vulnerable, security firms warn.
> >> >
> >> > Juan Carlos Perez, IDG News Service
> >> > Thursday, December 29, 2005
> >> >
> >> > Fully patched systems running Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 can be
> >> > successfully attacked by malicious hackers, various security firms
> >> > warned this week.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The attacks can be carried out thanks to a newly discovered
> >> > vulnerability in those operating systems' handling of corrupted .WMF
> >> > (Windows Metafile) graphic files, the firms said.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > More in the article...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > and before you get wonky, yes, snitly posted this earler but this is a
> >> > different source.
> >>
> >> Ooooooooooooooooh i'm paralyzed by the fear of a malicious software. Hell
> >> even virus riddled machines
> >> run quicker than a Mac.
> >
> > Being complacent makes you a target. But you're too stupid to think of
> > that.
>
> Ooohh - TravelinMan is back. The smartest man in the whole wide world.
>
>
> >>
> >> You are one of those hid in their basement while H.G. Wells read War Of
> >> The
> >> World over the radio didn't you.
> >
> > No, that was before my time but glad to see you're admitting you were
> > there. No wonder your thinking is so antiquated.
>
> Yep, it's him allright. The Phd genius.
>
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > JP
> > "The measure of a man is what he will do while
> > expecting that he will get nothing in return!"
Um zara, You're starting to act like eddie, who couldn't tell the
difference between TM and Me. I live in Chicago, TM is in Oklahoma. You
do understand those are two different states don't you? (And I don't
mean of atoms or matter for that matter).
TM runs a company, I've had my own business since 1975. Big difference,
but your ability to see could also be severely compromised like eddie's.
--
Regards,
JP
"The measure of a man is what he will do while
expecting that he will get nothing in return!"
.
- References:
- The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable‹NOT.
- From: Jim Polaski
- Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- From: MuahMan
- Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- From: Jim Polaski
- Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- From: zara
- The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable‹NOT.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why buy a MAC and not a PC?
- Next by Date: Re: CSMA's REAL Troll of the Year Award
- Previous by thread: Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- Next by thread: Re: The WinNuts say their "patched" PC's are invulnerable<NOT.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|