Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: Sandman <mr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:10:53 +0100
In article <o5OdnfTkwcWz9gneRVn-tA@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"MuahMan" <muahman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Did he claim that every piece of software for the Mac supported
>>>> them? Why should a tool aimed at RAW files necessarily support
>>>> them at all?
>>>>
>>>> Admittedly, based upon that review, Aperture has some serious flaws
>>>> right now, but that doesn't have any bearing on CMYK support
>>>> elsewhere.
>>>
>>> He and others made CMYK support seem to be a consequence of Mac OS
>>
>> Incorrect.
>
> Let me guess? Sandman is calling the reviewer a liar now as well? heh.
> Good times.
Muahman, still proud of his 0% score on the English test. :P
--
Sandman[.net]
"Apple beat Wintel to market with 64 bit personal computers"
- Edwin
.
- References:
- Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: MartinKess
- Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: Edwin
- Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: Lefty Bigfoot
- Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: Edwin
- Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: Sandman
- Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- From: MuahMan
- Ars Technica Aperture Review
- Prev by Date: Re: The TRUE iPod killer!
- Next by Date: Re: Alan Baker's special OSX version...
- Previous by thread: Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- Next by thread: Re: Ars Technica Aperture Review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|