Re: Vista beta vs. OSX

In article <1133466563.160747.79280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ed" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> George Graves wrote:
> > In article <1133406993.044567.37290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "ed" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > George Graves wrote:
> > > > In article <BFB34A6D.4B44%orthocross@xxxxxxx>,
> > > > Donald <orthocross@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > > Anyway, I was finally able to download that page. And I simply
> > > > > disagree
> > > > > with his definition, as do many, many others. So, "more
> > > > > authoritative"
> > > > > in
> > > > > this case means absolutely nothing. I consider only ONE written work
> > > > > to
> > > > > be
> > > > > "more authoritative" than another, or "PERFECT", as you claim your
> > > > > definition is: The Holy Bible of Historical Christianity.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, the Bible is "Perfect" all right.
> > > >
> > > > "And Cain knew his wife". Where the *** did SHE come from? I mean, if
> > > > you accept the nonsense that the first man and the first woman were
> > > > Adam
> > > > and Eve, and Eve had two sons, Cain and Able, unless Cain was screwing
> > > > a
> > > > sheep (the cute one, though, with the pretty pink ribbon) there were no
> > > > women in the world.
> > >
> > > um, sure there were- adam and eve had daughters as well.
> >
> > Would you like to show me the chapter and verse where the Old Testament
> > says that Adam and Eve had more than the two sons?
>
> i don't have a bible in front of me right now, but Seth is explicitly
> mentioned by name as a son of adam and eve, and there are other more
> generic mentions of additional siblings elsewhere.

You are right. I forgot about Enoch and Seth. Both born of Adam in later
years. But no women are mentioned, which is my point.
.

Quantcast