Re: Vista beta vs. OSX

George Graves wrote:
> In article <BFB34A6D.4B44%orthocross@xxxxxxx>,
> Donald <orthocross@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> > Anyway, I was finally able to download that page. And I simply disagree
> > with his definition, as do many, many others. So, "more authoritative" in
> > this case means absolutely nothing. I consider only ONE written work to be
> > "more authoritative" than another, or "PERFECT", as you claim your
> > definition is: The Holy Bible of Historical Christianity.
>
> Yeah, the Bible is "Perfect" all right.
>
> "And Cain knew his wife". Where the *** did SHE come from? I mean, if
> you accept the nonsense that the first man and the first woman were Adam
> and Eve, and Eve had two sons, Cain and Able, unless Cain was screwing a
> sheep (the cute one, though, with the pretty pink ribbon) there were no
> women in the world.

um, sure there were- adam and eve had daughters as well. and more than
two sons. you'd make a much more effective bible basher if you'd
actually read the thing george...

<snip>
> Jumping ahead to the New Testament, we have the Gospels of Matthew and
> Luke disagreeing on many points of the life of the Christ Figure. They
> totally disagree about the series of events leading up to the
> crucifixion.

why's that a big deal? you take 10 eye witnesses to a bank robbery
that happened an hour ago and you'll get 10 different stories. i don't
believe the bible is rooted in fact, but the gospels are basically
supposed to be different individuals perspectives on events. it'd be
dumb to expect them not to differ.

> Shall I go on?
>
> And this is what you Christians call a "Perfect" written work? The thing
> is full of more holes than a piece of swiss cheese. Just like your
> idiotic religion.

perfect means different things to different people

.

Quantcast