Re: Apple was created on the cheap...

Alan Baker wrote: 
In article <ctsan1pv7p6rjjiv64539b55kmtce2q0la@xxxxxxx>,
 Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:36:43 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


In article <j2san1tb6pljsmrh8thevjgkcgkgjdn4u8@xxxxxxx>,
Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 04:15:13 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


In article <mepan1dpqmkmamedg3tm5n5fn19erh3lhn@xxxxxxx>,
Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:20:24 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


In article <10man1d79jjqkkeq4pofqd62do2lff2u06@xxxxxxx>,
Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:56:17 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


In article <im98n15j0p4fjlqo9qn8houcr8la4epbih@xxxxxxx>,
Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


That Edwin tried to distract by talking about "other Maccies" doesn't change the fact that I was seeking examples of what *I* had said that didn't express agreement with *my* position in this thread.

That may be so. But clearly I was free to reference the "other
Maccies" component of his statement.

Only if you wanted to be tedious and useless. 

How so?


Now shut up.

The smart person who wants me to shut up would not keep repeating the
request but instead not respond at all. But that would be a smart
person.

Josh

That's one opinion; tedious and useless, but still an opinion. 

A smart person wouldn't respond...yet here you are responding.


Now shut up. 

That's your tedious and useless opinion. I already heard it.

Now shut up. 

A smart person wouldn't respond if they really wanted me to shut up.
But that would be a smart person.

Josh

That's your opinion... 

Very good Alan.


Now shut up. 

A smart person wouldn't respond if they really wanted me to shut up.
But that would be a smart person.

That's your opinion; useless and tedious, but yours. 

A smart person wouldn't respond if they really wanted me to shut up.
But that would be a smart person.

Funny. You don't even believe your own stated opinion; useless and tedious as it is. 

That's it Alan...let that aggression out. Before you know it you'll be
over this traumatic issue.



LOL

"Agresssion"? You really are a legend in your own mind, aren't you?


Now shut up. 

There, there Alan. I know that you're going through a difficult time.
Please continue...I'm happy to be the shoulder that you need to cry
on.


LOL

Believe what you've got to believe, Josh.

Now shut up. 

A smart person wouldn't respond if they really wanted me to shut up.
But that would be a smart person.



You are entitled to your tedious and useless opinions.

Now shut up.

Josh doesn't have to answer any more. You already lost big time. Now limp away to lick your wounds.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Malware rumours - Update
    ... Calling everyone who disagrees with you a liar ... Josh, it's no "proof" at all, and you know it. ... Alan Baker ... "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Only a matter of time
    ... Josh. ... distant third" to Linux in OS share? ... Alan Baker ... "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Apple was created on the cheap...
    ... >>> Josh doesn't have to answer any more. ... >>> limp away to lick your wounds. ... Alan Baker ... "If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Ha Ha, told you so! [was Re: Mac OS X hacked under 30 minutes]
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... Alan Baker wrote: ... Context is *very* important. ... And why you snip out what I say in a vain attempt to make yourself look ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: How to take in a string of any size?
    ... On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, josh wrote: ... >> There's a minor benefit of that it makes the algorithm Oinstead ... > Counting and seeking back to the start would be O(even if seeking itself ...
    (comp.lang.c)