Re: Interesting TravelinMan observations

In article <d4mnm1tc3asrs9a7oojbqdlo4jc4taaoer@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:47:38 GMT, George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >In article <e1inm1hfq77avvv45vjhe9m1mqv9g78ccm@xxxxxxx>,
> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 20:49:40 GMT, George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >>
> >> >In article <q1djm1ll74sqljteqhakmd63hj3qtfth7o@xxxxxxx>,
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 05:55:50 GMT, George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <9m7jm1h565ih2jsch7iq9dmpouqrh5f4i2@xxxxxxx>,
> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:53:20 GMT, George Graves
> >> >> >> <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> >> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >In article <bo4im1dmojgefosobo6j3b1ekv64ijg018@xxxxxxx>,
> >> >> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> On 2 Nov 2005 10:28:58 -0800, "Edwin" <thorne25@xxxxxxxx> chose
> >> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> >> bless us with the following wisdom:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Elizabot v2.0.2 wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> Edwin wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> > You dropped Joe into a tank full of piranhas, but you need
> >> >> >> >> >> > feel
> >> >> >> >> >> > no
> >> >> >> >> >> > remorse as they tear the flesh from his bones... after all,
> >> >> >> >> >> > you
> >> >> >> >> >> > did
> >> >> >> >> >> > say
> >> >> >> >> >> > "sorry."
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> > :-P
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Here's an earlier reference:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/52d47d
> >> >> >> >> >> 557
> >> >> >> >> >> 259
> >> >> >> >> >> ff3
> >> >> >> >> >> 9?d
> >> >> >> >> >> mode=source&hl=en
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> George wasn't involved in that one.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >You're right, someone did post Joe's company name six months
> >> >> >> >> >ealier.
> >> >> >> >> >However if you read the whold thread your post is from, you'll
> >> >> >> >> >discover
> >> >> >> >> >that Jim Polaski goaded others into Googling Joe's employer, and
> >> >> >> >> >he
> >> >> >> >> >confirmed the guess that was presented by DC.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >None of that changes the fact George Graves posted the name of
> >> >> >> >> >Joe's
> >> >> >> >> >employer, even though he says nobody should do that, and that
> >> >> >> >> >ZnU
> >> >> >> >> >followed up by showing Joe was posting from his employer's
> >> >> >> >> >server.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> And don't forget that DC's post didn't set off the firestorm
> >> >> >> >> about
> >> >> >> >> Joe's employer. It was simply dropped. It was the George/Znu
> >> >> >> >> combo
> >> >> >> >> that caused the start of Joe's woe's.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >My part in the whole mess consisted solely of threatening to
> >> >> >> >contact
> >> >> >> >Joe's superiors about his posting on company time. I did no
> >> >> >> >research,
> >> >> >> >I
> >> >> >> >posted no new information, and was not part of outing Joe AT ALL! I
> >> >> >> >deeply regret that threat, and have apologized to Joe for it (and
> >> >> >> >he
> >> >> >> >accepted my apology). Case closed.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm sure you'd like it to be anyway. Josh and Edwin have posted the
> >> >> >> proof that you're a liar several times in here. Its over, George.
> >> >> >> Give
> >> >> >> it up.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I've seen nothing they posted. And if they have posted info showing me
> >> >> >posting info about Joe's company that I did NOT pick-up from earlier
> >> >> >posters on this NG, they they are lying (which, given Edwin's
> >> >> >reputation, is not that hard to believe).
> >> >>
> >> >> They're using Google to post your very words, George. Are you saying
> >> >> that you were lying then or are you accusing Google of conspiring
> >> >> against you and adding false posts with your name on them?
> >> >
> >> >I'm saying that they couldn't have posted anything from Google that
> >> >proves that I am the one who first made public the information about
> >> >Joe's job, because I am not.
> >>
> >> As I said before, you weren't the first. But you and ZnU were the ones
> >> who made a big enough deal of it that it caught on.
> >
> >Ah, NOW your story changes. How convenient for you when you change lies
> >in the middle of an argument like that.
>
> My story is one hundered percent consistent. I already covered this in
> my earlier posts.
>
> >
> >You ignorant hick.
>
> You Bay Area ***.
>
> > I have NEVER maintained, in this entire argument,
> >that I didn't make a "big deal" out of where Joe worked. After all, I
> >was angry at him and used what I had as leverage against him. What I had
> >was his workplace, and I stepped over the bounds and threatened to use
> >the info.
>
> All of that came much later than the posts in question. Perhaps if you
> quit cowering behind your killfile like a little girl and read some of
> Josh's posts...?
>
> > I have maintained only that I'm not the one who went looking
> >for the information, nor was I the one who first posted that
> >information. Now, after megabytes of wasted bandwidth, you now change
> >your story to "...you weren't the first. But you and ZnU were the ones
> >who made a big enough deal of it that it caught on."
>
> Which been what I've been saying all along. But I do understand that
> you need to lie in order to get out from under the rock your previous
> lies have placed under. Too bad I'm not going to let you get away with
> it.

Get away with what, ***? You know as well as I that I only objected
to you saying that I was the one who "outed" Joe's workplace which I
have said at LEAST 10 times over this entire thread. I never said that I
didn't threaten to use the info against him. I did that. You're the only
one here who is lying (as usual).

> > My only argument
> >was that I wasn't the one who "outed" Joe's workplace, and you've been
> >arguing with me about that for days! Clyde, you are one SICK puppy. Get
> >help fast!
>
> Nice try to get out of it, George. I've been 100% consistent.

100% consistently lying, you mean.
.