Re: If Macs have no spyware....

On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:26:22 -0700, Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>In article <isigm1povia9sui23fi5vdv9br0f9nmavt@xxxxxxx>,
> Josh McKee <jtmckee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:57:29 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Josh McKee wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:22:00 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:22:53 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:45:45 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:53:45 -0600, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Did I cut out something that you thought was important and
>> >> >> >> >> >> should have
>> >> >> >> >> >> been addressed? Since we're in agreement that OS X is
>> >> >> >> >> >> susceptible to
>> >> >> >> >> >> malware I didn't see any point in addressing the rest of what
>> >> >> >> >> >> you had
>> >> >> >> >> >> written.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Typical wintroll perceptions of other imagined problems in
>> >> >> >> >> >other o/ses.
>> >> >> >> >> >Only windwoes has problems of significant magnitude.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> lol. Says the loser who claims that "OS X client doesn't have
>> >> >> >> >> Apache
>> >> >> >> >> installed".
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Says the moron that thinks XP is secure.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> See the difference between you and I is that my claims are supported
>> >> >> >> in fact. Yours, well, they're not supported at all.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Hardly. Your facts are erroneous and unsubstantiated.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Guffaw!!!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I thought you were a knowledgable foe. But it's become apparent
>> >> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> >> you're no better than the rest of the zealots.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >So sayeth the retarded Wintroll named Josh.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Ah. The personal attack. A clear admission that I have bested you.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Guffaw!! Only in your dreams, wintroll.
>> >> >> >I've spotted you for what you are. A Phoney.
>> >> >> >You do not advocate for the mac, but are a M$ apologist.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >You're a Mac Advocate??
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yep.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Liar.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> With "arguments" like that there's no reason to continue trying to
>> >> >> hold a rational debate with you. I've got better things to do than
>> >> >> argue with someone who can do no better than call their opponent
>> >> >> names. If you decide that you're willing to have a mature discussion
>> >> >> perhaps we can pick this up in the future. Until then I'm bored with
>> >> >> your childish posts.
>> >> >
>> >> >You act like the fool that you've made yourself be.
>> >> >First you yammer about being a Mac advocate, then bad mouth
>> >> >me for dumping XP in favor of a Mac.
>> >>
>> >> To be clear: I'm not "bad mouthing" you for dumping XP in favor of the
>> >> Mac.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Oh? Wasn't it you that said I couldn't run XP Pro and so
>> >cut and run??
>>
>> I recall saying that you appear to be incapable of using Windows and
>> using it securely. But that doesn't mean that I am against your having
>> bought a Mac to replace it.
>>
>> What I disagree with is your blaming Windows for your ineptitude.
>
>Then you're also blaming the millions and millions and MILLIONS of users
>who have the same problem along with him... to the tune of billions and
>billions and BILLIONS of dollars, right? Great way to treat a customer
>base... blame them for a myriad of security problems. By the way, have
>you gotten that list together yet? You know the one... it'll contain
>multiple reasons why OSX doesn't have things like malware. Or will you
>be switching back to your original theme that no one is interested in an
>OS with so small a marketshare?

Perhaps you'd be willing to take me up on my challenge? If I recall
correctly you live nearby making the challenge that much easier. And
it would address GreyClouds concerns. I'll even buy you lunch. Deal?

Josh
.