Re: If Macs have no spyware....

Josh McKee wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:22:53 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >Josh McKee wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:45:45 -0700, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:53:45 -0600, GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Josh McKee wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Did I cut out something that you thought was important and should have
> >> >> >> been addressed? Since we're in agreement that OS X is susceptible to
> >> >> >> malware I didn't see any point in addressing the rest of what you had
> >> >> >> written.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Typical wintroll perceptions of other imagined problems in
> >> >> >other o/ses.
> >> >> >Only windwoes has problems of significant magnitude.
> >> >>
> >> >> lol. Says the loser who claims that "OS X client doesn't have Apache
> >> >> installed".
> >> >
> >> >Says the moron that thinks XP is secure.
> >>
> >> See the difference between you and I is that my claims are supported
> >> in fact. Yours, well, they're not supported at all.
> >
> >Hardly. Your facts are erroneous and unsubstantiated.
> >
> >>
> >> >Guffaw!!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I thought you were a knowledgable foe. But it's become apparent that
> >> >> you're no better than the rest of the zealots.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >So sayeth the retarded Wintroll named Josh.
> >>
> >> Ah. The personal attack. A clear admission that I have bested you.
> >
> >Guffaw!! Only in your dreams, wintroll.
> >I've spotted you for what you are. A Phoney.
> >You do not advocate for the mac, but are a M$ apologist.
> >
> >>
> >> >You're a Mac Advocate??
> >>
> >> Yep.
> >
> >Liar.
>
> With "arguments" like that there's no reason to continue trying to
> hold a rational debate with you. I've got better things to do than
> argue with someone who can do no better than call their opponent
> names. If you decide that you're willing to have a mature discussion
> perhaps we can pick this up in the future. Until then I'm bored with
> your childish posts.

You act like the fool that you've made yourself be.
First you yammer about being a Mac advocate, then bad mouth
me for dumping XP in favor of a Mac.
How is that Mac Advocacy?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: If Macs have no spyware....
    ... >Josh McKee wrote: ... >>>Then if you are a Mac advocate, and that you are using windows, how can ... >> Windows is the security mess that you claim it to be. ... absolutely no risk to you and all the ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: If Macs have no spyware....
    ... >Josh McKee wrote: ... >>>Getting a mac advocate near you that also knows XP. ... >>>To verify that you have no AV software... ... You're avoiding the challenge. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Mac WiFi vuln. demoed
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... "Ellch and Maynor have found two similar flaws in the wireless device ... still a good deal more secure that your average Windows PC. ... Interesting that you would make such a claim after accusing me of not being a Mac advocate. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: If Macs have no spyware....
    ... Josh McKee wrote: ... >>> What do you find odd about my definition of a Mac advocate (setting ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Thieves
    ... wintroll. ... Say something a Mac advocate would say. ... I don't "advocate" any product - unless someone pays me. ... Huh? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)