Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: "ed" <news_test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:44:41 GMT
In news:BF830F8A.35AD3%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
> "ed" <news_test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
> g3j7f.6908$7h7.2827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 10/24/05 10:06 PM:
>
>> In news:znu-2A260F.00320325102005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> ZnU <znu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
>> <snip>
>>> I'm always amused that anyone who's ever worked for a large
>>> corporation (or, for that matter, interacted with one in any way)
>>> can possibly hold large corporations up as models of efficiency.
>>
>> take a look at the response some companies (walmart as an example)
>> had to hurricane katrina and then don't be so surprised. hell, look
>> at walmart in general.
>
> Do you know anyone who works there?
just a couple folks from high school, and my buddy's wife. why?
> While they do have many areas of
> efficiency - amazing efficiency - there are other places they fail
> horribly.
nobody said they're perfect, but you'd be hard pressed to find any large
organization that's run as efficiently overall.
> And then there is, of course, their poor treatment of their
> employees - which leads to high turn over which leads to less skilled
> / experienced employees.
high turnover? walmart's turnover rate is almost 25% below industry
average, and i'm not sure how skilled you need to be to work at walmart...
> I prefer the Costco model.
in what regard (regarding the topic at hand- efficiency)?
.
- References:
- Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: John
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: George Graves
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: B.B.
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: Bob B.
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: George Graves
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: TheLetterK
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: ZnU
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: TheLetterK
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: ZnU
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: TheLetterK
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: TheLetterK
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: ZnU
- Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- From: ed
- Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- Prev by Date: Re: spyware on macs ?
- Next by Date: Re: spyware on macs ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- Next by thread: Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|