Re: Another reason to buy Wintel.

Edwin wrote: 
TheLetterK wrote:

Edwin wrote:

Jim Polaski wrote:


In article <WbP4f.110050$Ph4.3360776@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
NashtOn <nana@xxxxx> wrote:



http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/10/17/robson/index.php

OTOH, Apple embraced it, so no biggie.
Just a reminder to one of the hard-headed bozos of this ng, immoutahere,
who thinks nothing good ever comes out of Wintel land.

Nicolas 

In your less than one-cell brain, you do remember that Macs are moving
to Intel next year, perhaps about the time this gets well-implemented.



You seem to have missed the point, as usual, Jim.

The innovation and leadership of the computer market is with Wintel,
not Apple.

What, exactly, is so innovative about preloading into nonvolitile memory?


So you dispute the article's description of this being new technology?
It's new, but not something I would call particularly innovative. People have been preloading applications into volitile memory for decades now.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Another reason to buy Wintel.
    ... > OTOH, Apple embraced it, so no biggie. ... > Just a reminder to one of the hard-headed bozos of this ng, immoutahere, ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Another reason to buy Wintel.
    ... Just a reminder to one of the hard-headed bozos of this ng, immoutahere, ... who thinks nothing good ever comes out of Wintel land. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Another reason to buy Wintel.
    ... OTOH, Apple embraced it, so no biggie. ... Just a reminder to one of the hard-headed bozos of this ng, immoutahere, who thinks nothing good ever comes out of Wintel land. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Another reason to buy Wintel.
    ... Jim Polaski wrote: ... >> Just a reminder to one of the hard-headed bozos of this ng, immoutahere, ... >> who thinks nothing good ever comes out of Wintel land. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)