Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Slumps

In article
<gmgraves-801739.10384614102005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article
> <DoNotSpamthegoat4-20A648.23244613102005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "B.B." <DoNotSpamthegoat4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <gmgraves-898EF5.18295513102005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > George Graves <gmgraves@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >In article <11ku0hp5p7p0n9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > > John <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051013/pl_nm/bush_politics_dc
> > >
> > >OK, I'll bite, why is this excellent news? I mean the guy is a lame
> > >duck. He can't run again, so why should he (or you for that matter) give
> > >a flying fornicatore what his approval rating is? I could see getting
> > >excited about it if our system of Federal government allowed for recalls
> > >but it doesn't. In early 2009, Mr, Bush is HISTORY, until then, his
> > >approval rating could fall to double naughts and it wouldn't mean squat.
> >
> > It's good news because it means some of the people who were just way
> > the *** too stupid to catch on yesterday "got it" today. It's an
> > indication that at least 60% of the population still has some functional
> > neurons.
>
> That's specious at best.
>
> > >But I have to ask this one question: Is the US ready for the Clinton
> > >Bitch? Because we're going to get her.
> >
> > Fine by me. I'm not a huge fan, but I honestly believe she'll clean
> > up some of what Bush has royally fucked for the last few years.
>
> You don't know "fucked-up", and won't until you see what that bitch has
> in store. Higher taxes, socialized medicine for a start. Her idiot
> husband was a moderate compared to this left wing ***.

George, I think higher taxes are a given, regardless of who comes next.
This huge debt/deficit will have to be paid someday you know.
.