Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- From: GreyCloud <cumulus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 21:20:39 -0600
Tim Smith wrote:
>
> In article <lW9Se.13023$aR1.7575@xxxxxxxx>,
> l e o <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > By strength, I mean making it taller, and much wider and stronger to
> > withstand category 5 storm. I have no engineering knowledge but it won't
> > be cheap as the whole system is 300 miles long. Not a single President
> > suggested to spend money on it in 60 years of history. The money they
> > requested was mainly for maintenance of the levee and other drainage
> > facilities. They expected the lake would spill over, but didn't expect
> > the levee would breach. There were 4 breaches but not all of them were
> > in the list of needing to repair.
>
> For most of the 60 years, it wasn't a problem, because there was 50
> miles of wetlands between the Gulf and New Orleans. That greatly
> reduces the storm surge from such hurricanes. Now something like 60% of
> that is gone, and the rest is rapidly disappearing.
>
This USGS story and video show the before and after.
http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_249201758.html
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- From: Steve Carroll
- Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- From: l e o
- Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- From: l e o
- Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- From: Tim Smith
- Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- Prev by Date: Re: Scientific American predicts Katrina disaster in 2001 (Was Re: So You Really Believe Bush Is Competent Huh?
- Next by Date: Re: Ignore Snit as usual... or would it be a mistake?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Bush vs, Reality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading