Re: Lies of the mayor of nothing and nowhere

In article <8jpeh1luo6i4t5kvsj7qcec8pmf9uuqo1o@xxxxxxx>,
Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 13:19:01 -0500, Jim Polaski
> <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
>
> >In article <ahfdh1hes52lofhh6miffgr6m2plpo2bgf@xxxxxxx>,
> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 03:05:46 -0500, Jim Polaski
> >> <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >>
> >> >In article <llvch1putulqel2uhudubfg7hvnmliqbp5@xxxxxxx>,
> >> > Mayor of R'lyeh <mayor.of.rlyeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:46:01 -0500, Jim Polaski
> >> >> <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> chose to bless us with the following wisdom:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article <11hc7r3k2gvuh10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> >> >> > "Elizabot v2.0.2" <Elizabot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Dave Fritzinger wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > The question is whether it is a complete quote, or was it taken
> >> >> >> > out
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > context. I tend to believe it is, since it is highly unlikely that
> >> >> >> > Jim
> >> >> >> > did indeed have lots of viruses on his Mac. Remember, Clyde, a sin
> >> >> >> > of
> >> >> >> > omission is as bad as a sin of commission.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3c8f8a107ea
> >> >> >> cef
> >> >> >> b?d
> >> >> >> mod
> >> >> >> e=source&hl=en
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Polaski to Mayor:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "I have had lots of viruses on my Mac, but they're WINDOWS VIRUSES.
> >> >> >> Too
> >> >> >> bad understanding that is so far over your meager head. The article
> >> >> >> reports Mac users "detecting" a virus, and anyone with any
> >> >> >> understanding
> >> >> >> knows that Mac AV utils will report finding a Windows based Virus."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thanks Liz...saved me the time and trouble.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Evidence is great, isn't it!
> >> >>
> >> >> It sure is. There's all the evidence anyone needs to know that its a
> >> >> direct quote from you.
> >> >
> >> >I'd spend a bit of time reading Elizabot's post if I were you klyde.
> >> >providing you can read and comprehend anything, it's pretty plain what
> >> >you've done and that is create another lie.
> >>
> >> So you deny posting that? No surprise, Jimbob. you never did care for
> >> the truth if it didn't suit your purposes.
> >
> >As has been pointed out to you klyde, you snipped things to suit YOUR
> >sad purrpose. It's a quote totally out of context. That however doesn't
> >bother you a bit being the liar that you are.
>
> I followed all the proper rules. I even used the three ellipses to
> show that it was taken from a whole sentence. I guess you're not the
> top man in the journalism field, eh Jim.
> And as to being a liar, you gave up any right to be outraged by that
> long ago. You want to talk about lies? Let's talk about the way you
> constantly insinuate that I alter everyone's posts when I only did it
> to you and only after you started altering mine.
> Face it, Jimbob. If you want to see the biggest liar in this group you
> only need to walk as far as the closest mirror.

Rules, you're a fine one to start quoting rules after the fact. However
you used the "rules" to alter something to your purpose to make it look
like there was a lie, when there wasn't because you omitted crucial
parts of the quote.

It's called "manipulation" klyde. No good journalist, not that you are
one, would do that.

Um, klyde I never, that is NEVER altered one of your posts until AFTER
you had done it several times and then I even posted that I had
corrected your post, unlike you who changes things willy-nilly to suit
your own purpose.

You're just an outright, bold-faced liar. Sorry is as sorry does, and
you're a mighty sorry sad-sack.

--
Regards,
JP
"The measure of a man is what he will do while
expecting that he will get nothing in return!"
.

Relevant Pages