Re: Statistics for comp.sys.mac.advocacy

In article
<teadams$2$0$0$3-82F2D6.07591329082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <BF377B5B.2B935%SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Snit <SNIT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "Tim Adams" <teadams$2$0$0$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
> > teadams$2$0$0$3-6A3190.17101628082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 8/28/05
> > 2:10 PM:
> >
> >
> > >> You claim this as you write to me as though you want a response... as
> > >> shown
> > >> below, though, you are, of course, lying.
> > >
> > > The why don't YOU prove it by providing links to the original post that
> > > these
> > > 'quotes" you've provided came from. I know for a fact that you can't, but
> > > be
> > > my guest and try. Prove that your not just running away and waving a
> > > white
> > > flag by making up quotes and attributing them to others.
> >
> > Conmgrats, my little trained monkey, you did amuse me. You get one more
> > response from me... keep being amusing and perhaps you can keep this going
> > for a bit.
> >
> > As far as doing a simple Google search for you - no thanks. Been there,
> > done that, have the T-shirt. You see, Tim, even when I *do* present you
> > with direct links to the posts where you and Steve stated your BS you
> > *still* lie and deny it. And that, Tim, is easy to find post to prove you
> > said *exactly* what I said you did... and there is *no* context you could
> > have said it in a reasonable way:
> >
> > http://snipurl.com/ha07
>
> Sorry but that ISN't the original post.

Did you really expect it to be? If a poster (who wasn't one of Snit's
sockpuppets or a troll) had to choose between the word of Snit and any
other poster without checking google (due to being unwilling to unravel
one of Snit's handmade hairballs to look for what *he* calls 'proof')
what do you think the poster would do? There's good reason why so many
have said about him what they have and/or killfiled.

--
Josh believes there is no reason to have security updates - Snit
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sandman... going to have to object to this...
    ... provocative than altering what the poster wrote by removing it IMO! ... I do not see any reason to snip anything that this 'code' prevents you from ... the poster and replier. ... When I asked Snit why he chose to use the name Carroll instead of Steve ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Semi OT: Knowledge
    ... "Is there a good reason that you chose not to indicate the source for the ... Notice "the source" Snit, clearly I was indicating that what you posted was ... appear gibberish whereas the original would not have that quality, ... I was confident after reading the first three lines of your original post ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Semi OT: Knowledge
    ... moving executive focus from lag financial indicators to more ... "Is there a good reason that you chose not to indicate the source for the ... Notice "the source" Snit, clearly I was indicating that what you posted was ... I was confident after reading the first three lines of your original post ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Statistics for comp.sys.mac.advocacy
    ... >>> Sorry but that ISN't the original post. ... If a poster (who wasn't one of Snit's ... > snit seem to think post that he makes are proof of something somebody else ... Josh believes there is no reason to have security updates - Snit ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: CALLING ALL QUAKERS!
    ... >>> What she believes to be the truth, though, may not be quite the same to ... > 1) The poster does not give his or her name. ... However, having no further reason ... if the allegations are true I cannot think of any good reason ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)