Re: OSX vs XP
- From: Lefty Bigfoot <nunya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:24:49 GMT
Andrew J. Brehm wrote
(in article <1h0dnxb.ob5vyt10odvswN%ajbrehm@xxxxxxxxx>):
> Yes. The feature Spotlight replaced found files a lot quicker. I only
> needed to know a part of the name. And my files I know.
locate still works from the CLI, and is very fast. Or, you
could use something like quicksilver, which I prefer to
spotlight for most things, since I'm usually looking for apps,
not a strange phrase in a document. The demo party thing with
images only works if you spend days or months putting search
tags in every image you have. nice idea, never happens in
practice.
> I installed Konfabulator yesterday, just to check it out. It didn't use
> any screen space and was activcated with, I think, F8.
didn't google or yahoo just buy them out? so much for that
product.
> There is either swapping or a waste of RAM. And data that is swapped out
> is loaded faster than data that hasn't been in memory before at all.
It should load at almost exactly the same speed, unless the
application is stored on a different drive (with different
performance) than the drive with the swap file(s) on it. How
much difference depends upon the startup complexity of the app.
> The idea that programs must not run when not used comes from the old
> days, before memory was cheap, disk space available, and swapping
> possible.
We wouldn't need GB of RAM in systems if people didn't think
this way. Fortunately it's cheap.
.
- References:
- Re: OSX vs XP
- From: Andrew J. Brehm
- Re: OSX vs XP
- From: Nicholas Buenk
- Re: OSX vs XP
- From: Andrew J. Brehm
- Re: OSX vs XP
- Prev by Date: Re: Subtleties
- Next by Date: Re: MS Customers must now submit. Submit I say! Dammit...
- Previous by thread: Re: OSX vs XP
- Next by thread: Re: OSX vs XP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|