Re: M$ designing software for geeks, Apple designing for real people

In article <WkaGe.8843$8g5.1000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zara
<zspook213@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Jim Polaski" <jpolaski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:jpolaski-79936B.13282828072005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > So says Jupiter Research.
> >
> > http://www.cio-today.com/story.xhtml?story_id=13000002WFO2
> >
> >
> > "It's almost like Microsoft is designing [software] for geeks and Apple
> > is designing for real people," said Joe Wilcox, a senior analyst at
> > Jupiter Research. "Microsoft's common man approach is centered on the
> > price [of its software]."
> >
> > And..
> >
> > Wilcox said that in terms of functionality, Microsoft's approach to the
> > common man is too complicated and requires a "walk-him-through-it
> > process." The user has to plug in something that launches the wizard.
> > Then the user has to go through six or seven steps to get the device to
> > complete a first-time configuration. "Whereas Apple's common-man
> > approach is you plug it in and it works," said Wilcox.
> >
> > More in the article.
> >
> > Regards,
> > JP

> Jim, a few pointers on your trolling technique.
> Do you notice when Edwin or Tom Elam post, they get many, many responses?

Jealous?

> Do you notice that when you post, nobody gives a ***?

Then why are you giving a ***?

> It's mostly the content. Windows people don't give a *** if you bash
> Windows. We know that it's the best, bar none.

Whoopee for Windoze users.

> Mac users on the other hand must try to "prove" their poor selection constantly.
> Ask yourself the question: "What does a Mac do better than a
> Windows machine"? Answer: NOTHING.

Macs have no malware, can the same be said for Windoze? The lack of
Windoze malware is the biggest proof that the Mac is superior over
Windoze.
.

Quantcast