Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- From: "M.I.5¾" <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:51:26 -0000
"- Bobb -" <bobb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O5CdnVnAc5IMWGLYnZ2dnUVZ_tGvnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"M.I.5¾" <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45ff8d45$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you very much for the explanation: I couldn't find that info
"- Bobb -" <bobb@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vqidnTToG9glO2PYnZ2dnUVZ_vmqnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I just bought an internal Sony DVD drive at CompUSA ( $25 after rebates
this week) and when I look at it ( with no media in it) in XP, I see that
it's called a DVD-RAM drive. I've only heard that term in home media
decks - to record everyday TV programs/overwrite etc. I've been looking
around .... via google to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD-RAM
http://aplawrence.com/Reviews/dvdram.html
etc
I can't find the answer to this:
1. In everyday PC use, do I care ?
2. Are DVD's recorded on my DVD-RW, +RW drives and this new drive gonna
be interchangable etc ?
It is pretty well a standard DVD +/- burner. It's just that it has the
added bonus of being able to read and write DVD-RAM disks as well. Any
more normal disks recorded on the drive will be just as interchangeable.
Windows defaults to using the DVD-RAM icon if the disk drive accepts
them.
There are generally mixed reactions to DVD-RAM disks, but despite their
higher per blank costs they do have some advantages.
1. They are directly handled by Windows XP and the drive when formatted
in FAT32 (the standard PC format - XP does not record any other DVD
format without additional software).
2. They have a rewrite life of 100,000 rewrites (compared with 1000 for
DVD+/-RW).
3. Being hard sectored, they have a higher reliability than RW disks
written using Drag-to-disk or InCD (packet incremental format). DVD-RAM
can also be written using packet incremental format and anecdotal
evidence suggests that it's faster, but the result can only be read on
PCs loaded with the appropriate packet incremental format software.
4. The one disadvantage they have is that the fastest drive is just 5X
(though the fastest disks that I have seen are 3X).
anywhere. So it's really the media that has the advantage ...
So THAT's why I've seen DVD-RAM used in the DVD video recorders.
BUT I wouldn't have been able to read those on my " std DVD player" -
thank you.
Ah now, video recorders. DVD-RAM has an additional advantage in these
machines. It was the only disk format that supported being able to be
simultaneously played and recorded at the same time (including playing back
the programme being recorded). I say 'was', because many current generation
machines now support sumultaneous record/play using the more regular DVD-RW
or DVD+RW media. However, these machines often have operational limitations
or can occasionally screw up the recording bit (although I can see how
DVD+RW machines could do this, I cannot see how DVD-RW machines can - but
they do). Toshiba are rumoured to have a machine with 2 laser heads, one to
record and one to play.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- References:
- Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- From: M.I.5¾
- Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- From: - Bobb -
- Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- Prev by Date: Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- Next by Date: Re: Question for the experts
- Previous by thread: Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- Next by thread: Re: DVD-RAM drive vs DVD-RW ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading