Re: Compare 2 computers vs. Dual Core



Clark <who@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was wondering what Adobe Premiere would do with a dual core,

I don't know if Premiere's core will use dual core, but I know that many of
its filters will.

answered that question, and the other thing I was worried about was burning
to DVD while something else is going on. That is not recommended on a one
processor system, but if you can set the programs to use just one core, I
suppose that would allow for such use, especially if you had a dedicated
Hard Drive.

The dedicated hard drive is much more important (and a goodly size memory
cache at the application level). I did that all the time on my home system,
prior to the most recent upgrade, and burning an ISO image (using Nero or
DVD Decrypter) from HD #2 or #3 was no problem at all. From ISOs, it's even
possible to burn two at once and still use IE or other light applications,
as long as the two source drives are separate.

I may have to consider how to set up the hard drives/DVD burner
as far as SATA or IDE to keep them from being interrupted.

FWIW, my old setup was:

HD1 - primary master (C:\ , K: (ISOS3))
HD2 - primary slave (later SATA) (D:\ (DATA), I:\ (ISOS1))
HD3 - SATA (E:\ (VIDEO), J:\ (ISOS2), L:\ (ISOS4))
DVD1 - (16x) secondary master
DVD2 - (8x) 1394 external
DVD3 - (rarely used) secondary slave

DVD1 and 3 were flakey trying to burn simultaneously at full speed for DVD1,
but could at 4x; DVD 1 + 2 could burn simultaneously at each their own full
speed from any pair of HD.

Occasionally got a few coasters when burning from J:\ and L:\ simultaneously
because I forgot they were on the same drive; also, burning from K: tended
to require not doing much of anything else on the system.

On my new system (P-D 940) it's now HD1-3 all SATA, and the 16x and 8x
drives both on the internal PATA channel. We'll see if they'll both burn at
full speed at the same time.

For burning DVD images from windows, one very handy thing is to create a
partition on each drive for images - I usually do 20 or 25gb - and then
format it with 64k blocks rather than the XP default. Then clear and
reformat them frequently, to avoid fragmentation.


--
Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/

"What's the use of yearning for Elysian Fields when you know you can't get
'em, and would only let 'em out on building leases if you had 'em?" (WSG)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Replace DVD drive easy ?
    ... has crapped out (it plays DVD movies but doesn't recognize CDROM, ... CDs, or blank CDs for burning, even after reboot). ... Or just a driver for the new drive (the ... drives, cards, etc. a lot. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize)
  • Re: cyclic redundancy check
    ... -Files were not successfully/completely transferred to DVD. ... again and use the Validate/Verify option in your burning software to test ... There are cleaning kits for discs and for drives. ... air if sprayed too densely will cause an accumulation of moisture. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Weird problem
    ... XPs built-in software burning program only supports CD-R. ... To burn a CD-RW with packet writing you need third-party ... All DVD burning requires third-party. ... burner (dual drives). ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Recognizing Drives
    ... But I'm also wanting to do all of what a burner is for. ... I didn't try it burning. ... I was planning on switching cables to put the DVD burner at the end of the cable rather than ... make sure your /etc/fstab has an entry for the drives. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: DVDs are not playing or recognized
    ... across the answer on this problem at least for one of the drives. ... it removed made my DVD ROM drive work, ... I did a fresh install of XP Pro SP 2 less than 3 ... ever install Nero again. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.video)