Re: Parallax vision?
- From: "UZnal" <unalz-at-mail333-dot-com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:28:21 +0200
(Cough, cough, inhale, cough) Man, that's good Blue.
Mmmmm ...
UZ, I have created one of the biggest conceptual S.H.I.T.s that I ever
have...
Why, a quite plausible idea, and you are not alone.
In the same way that multiple McMasters could run (with the lost
OS/Master software), how about multiple XGA-2 operating in parallel to
process the same image? One adapter is the dominant (obey your master,
master!) and it actually displays the resulting map. The other XGA-2
produce one or more of the maps needed, and the master uses those
pre-written pages to display.
Subject: Re: W98SE MCA Adapters
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:17:41 +0200
"You could build a video wall on your screen with multiple adapters. All you
have to do is to program the coprocessors with the appropriate addresses in
the display buffer of the main adapter, it is the one which you assign
control over the display. The worker coprocessors know which range of the
buffer they should regenerate and your player threads know which
coprocessors they command. This scenario is possible because the coprocessor
is loosely coupled to the video subsystem, it need not be its home display
buffer which it accesses. It could be any memory address, and DMA is
appropriate if it is outside its home buffer address range."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parallax vision?
- From: Louis Ohland
- Re: Parallax vision?
- References:
- Parallax vision?
- From: Louis Ohland
- Re: Parallax vision?
- From: Louis Ohland
- Parallax vision?
- Prev by Date: Re: Don't interrupt me while I'm looking!
- Next by Date: Re: Parallax vision?
- Previous by thread: Re: Parallax vision?
- Next by thread: Re: Parallax vision?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|