Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- From: Jim Shorney <jshorney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:29:45 -0500
"David L. Beem" wrote:
Hi Dan,
I have Landmark Speed210. Is that a newer, but stillDunno, but there is a Kingston utility of that version too, and newer
old, version of Kingston Speed200?
(for the 486 Turbochips)...
Landmark "Speed" was one of the most used and quoted benchmarks back in
the good ole DOS days. It can present som einteresting results with 486
and higher CPUs that have L2 cache, but can still be useful as a point
of comparison between similar CPUs.
You can see some Landmark bench results on my pages here:
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney/T3T4.HTM
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney/p70.htm#bench
-Jim (way ahead of you this time)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- From: UZnal
- Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- References:
- Good CPU benchmark program?
- From: David L. Beem
- Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- From: Dan-the K
- Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- From: David L. Beem
- Good CPU benchmark program?
- Prev by Date: Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- Next by Date: Re: Generic 1.44Mb on PS/2 systems (was "Auction: Nice Model 77 on the bay")
- Previous by thread: Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- Next by thread: Re: Good CPU benchmark program?
- Index(es):