Re: Dave, is this it?

OK, Dave, why must you kick against the goads?

Have you EVER looked at the "reply to" field? I guess that
ohlandl@xxxxxxxxxxx is not a valid address.

Did you try some of them thar peyote buttons down there? They AREN'T
what comes on pizzas...

I see the message to Garcia made it back...

"David L. Beem" wrote:
>
> Hi Louis,
> > Dave, it must be you. Wild Bill manages to get through. Why can't you?
> 'Net' changed to 'not', because it did *not* go through on the Charter
> end:
> ------------------------------------------
> Reporting-MTA: dns; mtao02.charter.not
> Arrival-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:25:28 -0400
> Received-From-MTA: dns; mxsf26.cluster1.charter.not (10.20.201.226)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Final-Recipient: RFC822; <ohlandl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.2.1
> ------------------------------------------
> The last one didn't bounce, did you get it?
> David
> David@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
Reply to ohland@xxxxxxxxxxx
.

Quantcast