Re: What is RAID0 good for?



GMAN wrote:
In article
<8b469fff-e694-4283-83cb-dc1db4ecc379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"mscotgrove@xxxxxxx" <mscotgrove@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 14, 10:44=A0am, M.L. <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My friend has a Win XP =A0PowerSpec B647 desktop with two 250 GB
hard drives configured in the BIOS as RAID0. It appears that
whatever happens to one drive happens to the other, so when she was
infected with a virus both hard drives were infected, and both were
simultaneously cleaned by the same antivirus scanner.

What good is having those 2 drives perform like that when she is a
non-techie home user who would be better off with the use of 2
independent hard drives? Is there a way to turn off the RAID
behavior so she can get usage more suitable to her needs? Thanks.

RAID 0 is nor really RAID as there is no redundancy. As discovered,
if one drive fails, in effect all data is lost.

The reason for it, in theory it will make the drive run faster. For
the average user, this speed difference may never be seen.

A safer option would be to use JBOD (Just a Bunch Of Disks) and
concatinate the two to make a single 500GB drive.

How is JBOD "safer" than Raid0 ?

You dont lose everything when one drive dies with properly implemented JBOD.

If a 500GB drive was not required, then 2 x 250GB drives would be a
nice simple solution. This is the option I would choose.

To protect against single disk failure, you require RAID 1. However
a virus problem would still ingect both drives.

To change the setup will require reformating both drives, and so all
current data MUST be backed up first, and then the operating system
etc will need reloading. Probably not worth the effort, just make
sure you have regular backups.

Michael
www.cnwrecover.com


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hilfe: bei linux software raid5 2!! Platten rausgeflogen
    ... ATA drives being 'dropped' from a RAID volume was a commonly heard ... all error recovery; while RAID cards are /also/ programmed to take ... realize TLER-capable hard drives should not be used in non-RAID ...
    (de.comp.hardware.laufwerke.festplatten)
  • Re: GHOST RAID 1 to 0
    ... Check the docs for the RAID controller or phone Dell technical support. ... The problem is that if I disable the Dell PERC 5/i the server does not see any of the physical drives and I believe that there are only 2 onboard SATA controllers so a multi-drive environment would not work in this environment. ... The client would like everything on seperate hard drives ie) OS (Mirrored ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: GHOST RAID 1 to 0
    ... If I could the client would like no raid at all just separate physical disks as stated below. ... The problem is that if I disable the Dell PERC 5/i the server does not see any of the physical drives and I believe that there are only 2 onboard SATA controllers so a multi-drive environment would not work in this environment. ... The client would like everything on seperate hard drives ie) OS (Mirrored ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: HDD Compatibility
    ... and new larger drives appear in the ... BIOS Upgrades ... available expansion slot and then connecting your hard drives to it. ... than having to connect them to the controller card itself. ...
    (alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt)
  • RE: Raid problem?
    ... We'll need a bit more information about your server before we're able to ... Based on what I see so far RAID is NOT configured on this server, ... RAID 5 configuration or adding more drives, ... It says all hard drives OK. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)