Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen <kimiraikkonen85@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:36:14 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 15, 9:02 pm, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
kimiraikkonen <kimiraikkone...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Most of the computer users, including professionals, don't
look at or take care SMART's "reallocated sectors count"
value, they usually take care full / surface scans against data
loss unless SMART reaches to a critical level with alerting.
Anyone who does it like that aint a 'professional'.
Really? Where are you working or what are you working for?
"Professional"
The MUCH more viable approach is to monitor the raw
SMART data over time and consider what changes mean.
Sure, but how many vendors take care SMART status inside warranty?
That's another important point.
I have e-mailed Seagate to ask about the topic title, they haven't replied
with a satisfactory answer so far. Maybe they know or not. Who knows?
Its more likely that they just gave up on your rather fractured english.
It's not on your hands to judge my English. Don't conclude unless
you're sure, if you feel that you're sure, query yourself more than
once. If you're not tended to be helpful, do not post please.
This group is not English-teaching group.
My native language is not English. If it's yours, then try to learn
different language and judje yourself how good you are. I
Even sometimes, i hear contact noise, i detailed it them, they said:
And this is a good example of rather fractured english
where it isnt at all clear what you are trying to say.
If you hadn't understood what i've told you, search google "head
contact" or "head crash" then see what it means.
if the drive passes long test, i shouldn't worry.
Thats rather superficial advice, because it wont pick up increasing numbers
of reallocated sectors which is certainly an indication that the drive is dying.
As i'm not an amateur, i usually watch SMART values to see what goes on.
My other SMART values are those (latest):
Are they any value that should make me concerned? (no pending or uncorrectable sectors)
No, the other values are fine given that its a seagate drive. Seagate drives
do have those rather high seek error rate and hardware ECC recovered numbers.
That's good news, thanks at least for hardware ECC and others.
Attribute Name Threshold Value
Worst Raw value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 (01) Raw Read Error Rate 34 63
53 2778681
3 (03) Spin Up Time 0
70 70 0
4 (04) Start/Stop Count 20
100 100 692
5 (05) Reallocated Sectors Count 36 98
98 98
7 (07) Seek Error Rate 30
81 60 158998323
9 (09) Power-On Hours 0
93 93 6591
10 (0A) Spin Retry Count 97 100
100 0
12 (0C) Device Power Cycle Count 20 98
98 2602
194 (C2) Temperature 0
21 51 21
195 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 0 61
53 2778681
197 (C5) Current Pending Sector Count 0 100
100 0
198 (C6) Uncorrectable Sector Count 0 100
100 0
199 (C7) UltraDMA CRC Error Count 0 200
200 0
200 (C8) Write Error Rate (Multi Zone Error Rate) 0 100
253 0
202 (CA) Data Address Mark Errors 0 100
253 0
Sorry, if the lines slide out of the page,
The correct terminology is wrap.
i use Google to access newsgroups, don't know how you get here :-(
You can see that from the post headers.
Implict answer of you. Bad English for me ? :-( I don't think so.
OK, close (do not append) the topic. It's enough i think. Still to
many confusions. There are some good definitions on Wikipedia about
"reallocated sectors."
Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- References:
- Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: kimiraikkonen
- Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- From: Rod Speed
- Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- Next by Date: Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- Previous by thread: Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- Next by thread: Re: Need help with "reallocated sector count"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|