Re: RAID newbie...can I have several partitions on a RAID 1 array?

Arno Wagner wrote:

Previously Ian R <sorry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi


I'm thinking of setting up a RAID 1 array with two 250GB Drives (7K250 SATAII )


This is my first venture into RAID so I have a few newbie questions...


Can I split the drive into several partitions or does it have to remain as a single partition?


You can partition the RAID array. With most hardware-RAID set-ups you cannot form the ARRAY from partitions, but juts whole disks.


If I can, will most software partition managers (PQ Partition Magic, Acronis, Ghost) cope with RAID or do I need a special partition manager? Can you recommend one?


Should work.


As far as my software is concerned I presume they ignore the RAID
aspect and just see it as a normal single drive?


Yes.


Just in case your were wondering... I am aware that RAID 1 is a
mirrored array. I'll be using the Sil 3114 RAID controller on my
ASUS A8N-SLI Premium Mobo.


One thing: For true redundancy, you need a spare controller. There is
software to reconstruct RAID data from the disks only, but (AFAIK) it
costs money and you need another disk. Hardware RAID 1 does not
protect you from controller failure and usually the disk layout is
specifically designed so that you cannot access the individual drives
without the controller. The only reason for this is to force you to
buy a new controller from the same company (i.e. corporate greed) as
you used to create the array. That it is possible to do this
differently is demonstrated by Linux software RAID 1: It places the
RAID descriptor at the end of the disk and you can access each disk
without RAID directly. Hardware controllers usually place the
descriptor at the beginning of the disk to prevent use of the
disk without controller.

Arno


I don't disagree with Arno at all: as he kinda said, for true
*hardware* redundancy, you need *at least* a spare controller.
But even total hardware redundancy does not supply any protection
against bad software (e.g., Windows) or against funble-fingers.

My conclusion: RAID is nice, but backup is essential.
--
Cheers, Bob
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Have you booted from SRC/P RAID?
    ... You're thinking of a completey different kind of RAID configuration. ... The SRC/P is a SCSI-RAID controller card that inserts into a PCI slot ... whether it's a physical disk or a logical disk, ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: Installing Adaptec 1420SA SATA RAID controller
    ... neither disk nor RAID array. ... What about returning the Adaptec controller and replacing it with some ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Outlook on the SBS 2003 Server
    ... I was more specifically answering the question of RAID (asked by Duncan ... It has lots of controller drivers right on the CD, ... the server and restoring is a breeze. ... How does it work - re you put the image on different hardware, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Implementing a RAID 1 Array
    ... For your RAID 1 drive is hardware RAID 1, you will not see the mirrored ... drive in the Disk Management console. ... The Volume Shadow Copy Service provides the backup infrastructure for the ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2003 - Hal.dll Getting Currupt
    ... Consistenly getting that error would mean, in my mind, a strong possibility of disk corruption - especially with a raid set. ... If you have hardware raid, you should be able to enter the raid diagnostics at boot time, and run some tests on the controller, disks, and raid set from there. ... "Windows could not start because the following file is missing or corrupt: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)