Re: Boot.ini question
- From: "Timothy Daniels" <TDaniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:46:09 -0800
"Rod Speed" wrote:
You cant do it that way either. You should be leaving the 80G drive with the only boot.ini at the top of the hard drive boot order list, so you can be sure that that drive is being booted by the bios.
That is clearly being done. First, with the 80GB HD at the head of the HD boot order, each of the 3 HDs were booted. Then with the 80GB HD remaining at the head of the HD boot order and the order of the other 2 HDs reversed, all 3 HDs were again booted.
Next, with the 40GB HD at the head of the HD boot order, each of the 3 HDs were booted. Then with the 40GB HD remaining at the head of the HD boot order and the order of the other 2 HDs reversed, all 3 HDs were again booted.
Next, with the 120GB HD at the head of the HD boot order, each of the 3 HDs were booted. Then with the 120GB HD remaining at the head of the HD boot order and the order of the other 2 HDs reversed, all 3 HDs were again booted.
You can see, if you study the results, that the HD that contained the OS that got booted was always the one corresponding to the value of rdisk(n), where "n" was the displacement from the head of the HD boot order.
*TimDaniels*
THEN you should swap JUST the 40G and the 120G drives in the boot order list, while keeping them at lower priority in the boot order list than the 80G drive and see what drive gets booted when you select each of the boot.ini entrys with rdisk values of 1 and 2.
Each of the three entries in the boot.ini-derived boot menu was selected and the OS that loaded was recorded. A file with a name identifying the HD it was on was put on the desktop of each OS in partition #1 of each HD to aid in
identifying the HD. Since the boot.ini files contained entries
only for the partition #1 on each HD, the experiment was a specific test for the meaning of the "rdisk()" parameter.
Then the order of the 2nd and 3rd HD in the hard drive boot order was reversed, and the above experiment was repeated.
RESULTS
HD boot order: 80GB, 40GB, 120GB menu option selected: booted: (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 80GB, part 1 (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 40GB, part 1 (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 120GB, part 1
HD boot order: 80GB, 120GB, 40GB menu option selected: booted: (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 80GB, part 1 (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 120GB, part 1 (80GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 40GB, part 1
HD boot order: 40GB, 80GB, 120GB menu option selected: booted: (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 40GB, part 1 (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 80GB, part 1 (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 120GB, part 1
HD boot order: 40GB, 120GB, 80GB menue option selected: booted: (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 40GB, part 1 (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 120GB, part 1 (40GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 80GB, part 1
HD boot order: 120GB, 40GB, 80GB menue option selected: booted: (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 120GB, part 1 (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 40GB, part 1 (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 80GB, part 1
HD boot order: 120GB, 80GB, 40GB menue option selected: booted: (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 0, part 1 120GB, part 1 (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 1, part 1 80GB, part 1 (120GB part 1 boot.ini) rdisk 2, part 1 40GB, part 1
DISCUSSION
The "rdisk()" parameter was seen to always correspond to the position of the hard drive in the Phoenix Tech BIOS's hard drive boot order through all permutations of the hard drive boot order.
No it wasnt, you confused the issue with the SIIG IDE PCI controller card.
Whether this correspondence is found in other BIOSes is unknown by this investigator, but since the Phoenix Tech's BIOSes are used by several large manufacturers of PCs, it is probably a very common meaning for "rdisk()" among modern PCs running a Microsoft Windows operating system.
Fraid not, and phoenix bios are the least commonly used of the 3 majors. And most dont have their drives on a PCI controller either.
*TimDaniels*, Investigator
Wanker, actually.
.
- References:
- Re: Boot.ini question
- From: Timothy Daniels
- Re: Boot.ini question
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: Boot.ini question
- Prev by Date: Re: Boot.ini question
- Next by Date: Re: Boot.ini question
- Previous by thread: Re: Boot.ini question
- Next by thread: Re: Boot.ini question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading