Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: timeOday <timeOday-UNSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:14:51 -0700
Peter wrote:
Imagine that 1M5 h is an average. To be of any significance, you need
Maybe it doesn't help YOU. If I had to chose between otherwise identical drives, one with 300,000 MTBF, other with 1,500,000 MTBF; I would pick a second one. Even if that would be for a single hard disk in my PC.
I'd pick the one with the longer warranty.
It's true that MTBF doesn't say much about a particular drive - for exactly the same reason that the observed lifetime of a single drive says little about the MTBF of that model.
.
- References:
- MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: John
- Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: Peter
- Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- From: Peter
- MTBF: A bunch of bs
- Prev by Date: Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- Next by Date: Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- Previous by thread: Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- Next by thread: Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|