Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- From: IronFelix <annenk38@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:24:11 -0500
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:24:16 +1100, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>IronFelix <annenk38@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
>> This is a bit puzzling: I have two 160G ATA drives is soft
>> RAID0 under Windows XP with 4k stipe. Both have
>> SMART enabled, and both report 0 reallocated sectors.
>
>What is the full SMART report ? There
>aint just reallocated sectors with bads.
>
>Show the Everest report
>http://www.majorgeeks.com/download.php?det=4181
>
>> But chkdsk /r/x found and reported 4k in bad blocks.
>
>That's likely just one bad sector.
>
>> Do ATA drives reallocate bad sectors automatically,
>
>Yes, but only in specific situations, where the data
>can be retrieved to put in the reallocated sector.
>
>> or do I need to scan both with manufacturer's (Samsung) utility?
>
>Yes.
>
Thanks for all replies. Here's the full SMART report:
the 1st-4th data fields are "threshold", "Value","Worst" and "Data",
respectively.
--------[ EVEREST Home Edition (c) 2003-2005 Lavalys, Inc.
]------------------------------------------------------------
Version EVEREST
v2.01.347
Homepage
http://www.lavalys.com/
Report Type Quick Report
Computer CARCASS
(CARCASS)
Generator vlad
Operating System Microsoft
Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 (WinXP Retail)
Date 2006-01-27
Time 21:02
--------[ SMART
]-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ SAMSUNG SP1604N (0651J1FW513334) ]
01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
03 Spin Up Time 0 59 48 6912
OK: Always passing
04 Start/Stop Count 0 96 96 4249
OK: Always passing
05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0
OK: Always passing
09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1407531
OK: Always passing
0A Spin Retry Count 49 100 100 1
OK: Value is normal
0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 519
OK: Always passing
C2 Temperature 0 163 112 25
OK: Always passing
C3 Hardware ECC Recovered 0 100 100 411199259
OK: Always passing
C4 Reallocation Event Count 0 253 253 0
OK: Always passing
C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0
OK: Always passing
C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
C9 <vendor-specific> 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
[ SAMSUNG SV1604N (S01FJ10W401594) ]
01 Raw Read Error Rate 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
04 Start/Stop Count 0 97 97 3912
OK: Always passing
05 Reallocated Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
07 Seek Error Rate 51 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
08 Seek Time Performance 0 253 253 0
OK: Always passing
09 Power-On Time Count 0 98 98 1636365
OK: Always passing
0C Power Cycle Count 0 100 100 539
OK: Always passing
C2 Temperature 0 160 106 26
OK: Always passing
C5 Current Pending Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
C6 Off-Line Uncorrectable Sector Count 10 253 253 0
OK: Value is normal
C7 Ultra ATA CRC Error Rate 0 100 100 0
OK: Always passing
C8 Write Error Rate 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
C9 <vendor-specific> 51 100 100 0
OK: Value is normal
So reallocation is triggered under a narrow set of circumstances, and
I suppose running chkdsk isn't one of them? I guess running a
manufacturer's utility should help. Both of these disks are nearly 4
years old with very heavy use history, so they should be nearing their
EOL. Thanks again!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- References:
- bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- From: IronFelix
- Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- From: Rod Speed
- bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- Prev by Date: Re: Boot.ini question
- Next by Date: Re: MTBF: A bunch of bs
- Previous by thread: Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- Next by thread: Re: bad blocks found but SMART reports zero reallocated sectors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|