Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: "Peter" <peterfoxghost@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:46:18 -0500
> > Maybe, because how data is organized on each disk, it makes difficult to
> > stream (read sequentially) with full speed, while reading every other
> > sector?
>
> I'm not sure, but I don't think the data is organized much differently.
The
> two disks of a RAID1 (2 disk) array are supposed to have identical data.
So
> what hinders a RAID1 controller to read one stripe from disk A while
> reading another stripe from disk B (just like the same controller would do
> in a RAID0 configuration)? It also could do head movement optimization,
> like using one disk for reading the disk index and the other disk for
> reading the data (or more elaborate schemes to minimize head movement).
> From what people wrote here, the RAID controllers don't seem to do this
> with RAID1. Anybody knows why not?
It is organized very differently. There are NO STRIPES in RAID1. On each
disk data seem to be organized exactly the same as on standalone hard drive.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Peter
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- References:
- Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Mark
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Bruce T. Berger
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Bob Willard
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Antoine Leca
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Peter
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Mark
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Peter
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Gerhard Fiedler
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Peter
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Gerhard Fiedler
- Poor raid 1 performance?
- Prev by Date: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Next by Date: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Next by thread: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|