Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: "Antoine Leca" <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:36:18 +0100
In news:PMydnXt6U44VbxPenZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bob Willard wrote:
> since RAID1 has twice as many on-disk read channels
> and twice as many seek mechanisms.
Yes, but also _any_ read is done twice, on both channels and both mechanisms
(and furthermore they are then checked for equality between, which adds a
step, which could be a reason for misperformance).
I do not see why you could see improvements, any other things being equal of
course.
What am I missing here?
Antoine
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Bob Willard
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Mark
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Peter
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- References:
- Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Mark
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Bruce T. Berger
- Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- From: Bob Willard
- Poor raid 1 performance?
- Prev by Date: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Next by Date: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Next by thread: Re: Poor raid 1 performance?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|