Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: John Doe <jdoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:42:41 GMT
CJT <abujlehc prodigy.net> wrote:
> John Doe wrote:
<snipped condescending/rude remarks>
>> I would very much enjoy matching my personal computer skills
>> against yours.
>>
> <snip>
>
> It's a real shame that there even is such a thing as "personal
> computer skills." In days gone by, that would have been akin to
> "file cabinet skills" or perhaps "writing pad skills."
I use speech recognition for command, automation, and dictation.
Modern personal computers are very complex machines and are likely
to become much more so. Sooner or later, the same skills will be
used to master robotics. Your analogy is a stretch.
> --
> The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
> minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che... prodigy.net.
>
>
> Path: newssvr22.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm02.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr19.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!9c3d6694!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <433BDCA7.2070207 prodigy.net>
> From: CJT <abujlehc prodigy.net>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050914
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
> Subject: Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
> References: <Xns96E012EEA1750wisdomfolly 207.115.63.158> <CfKdnZNa1__bUabeRVn-gw comcast.com> <Xns96E04A63B484Dwisdomfolly 207.115.63.158>
> In-Reply-To: <Xns96E04A63B484Dwisdomfolly 207.115.63.158>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 16
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.67.216.92
> X-Complaints-To: abuse prodigy.net
> X-Trace: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com 1127996583 ST000 67.67.216.92 (Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:23:03 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:23:03 EDT
> Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
> X-UserInfo1: TSU[ I_AOXVCRTXXDJN _VTDEZXXPGLLEXRZKB]MPXHJUZ]CDVW[AKK[J\]^HVKHG^EWZHBLO^[\NH_AZFWGN^\DHNVMX_DHHX[FSQKBOTS BP^]C RHS_AGDDC[AJM_T[GZNRNZAY]GNCPBDYKOLK^_CZFWPGHZIXW C[AFKBBQS E DAZ]VDFUNTQQ]FN
> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:23:03 GMT
> Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage:359334
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: Folkert Rienstra
- Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- References:
- RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: John Doe
- Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: Bob Willard
- Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: John Doe
- Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- From: CJT
- RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- Prev by Date: Re: MTBF of a LTO2- and DDS/5-tapedrive
- Next by Date: Netgear Network Storage SC101
- Previous by thread: Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- Next by thread: Re: RAID versus 10,000 rpm?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
