Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:38:26 +1000
mydeadpresidents@xxxxxxxxx wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> mydeadpresidents@xxxxxxxxx wrote
> Thanks for the help Rod. I'm running out
> of ideas fast with few resources to turn to.
Yeah, can be a problem with imagers.
That's another advantage with True Image, a very
decent forum with Acronis reps responding to questions.
>>> I've been happily using Drive Image 2002
>>> for some time now with great success,
>>> Its getting pretty dated in its capabilitys now,
>>> time for something much better like True Image.
>>> but recently I'm having a problem and could really use some help.
>>> I have one Hard Drive with several partitions. In the past I
>>> have restored my entire primary partition (Operating System)
>>> to a Drive image file on a different partition (same HD).
>> What you actually did was restore to a different partition
>> than the one you created the image file from.
> Not sure if I'm understanding you.
I was just quibbling with your wording there.
You cant restore TO an image file.
> In the past I successfully created an image of partition C, saving
> that image to partition D. Later when I restored partition C, I did
> it using the image saved to partition D (although that image had
> since been moved onto a DVD then moved back to a newly
> created partition "D" on the same hard drive). In the past each
> time I restored my primary drive I made the choice to delete the
> primary partition and then restore it with the image previously
> created by drive image. So in that sense I've delete and recreated
> the primary partition each time. Other than that I've never recreated
> or manipulated my primary partition so I'm not sure how it
> would be a different partition that I'm restoring TO.
Sure, I worded that a bit carelessly myself, I didnt mean to emphasise that bit.
>>> I'm using (past and present) Windows XP SP2 with every thing formated
>>> in NTFS. In the past Drive image has broken up my image files into
>>> two pieces one over 2 gigs and the other about 1.6 gigs.
>> Thats normal, it does that because 2GB is a
>> file size that is supported on all file systems.
>>> No problems restoring.
>>> Since my last backup, I wanted to change the sizes of my partitions.
>>> I did nothing to my primary partition, but I ended up deleteing all
>>> my logical drives and then recreating them (with the same names and
>>> drive letters but with different GB allotments). Before altering my
>>> old logical drive partitions, I burned the image file to a DVD. (I
>>> didn't back up Drive image to DVD, I just moved the locally created
>>> image onto a DVD and burned it that way). Later, after recreating
>>> my logical drive partitions, I moved the two file image from DVD back
>>> onto my Hard Drive and from there I restored my primary drive
>>> without issue. (Something I can still do without a problem)
>> Yes, that approach works fine.
>>> After restoring, I made some changes and added some applications,
>>> then I created another new image with drive image as I have done
>>> many times in the past. (This time the second image file was 1.8
>>> gigs instead of 1.6 but otherwise no different). Later on when I
>>> tried to restore from that image I got the error "Error #1831 Image
>>> File Not Found".
>>> I repeated the process with verify ON, but then it just dumped me
>>> out before finishing with the same error message.
>> DI 2002 can get seriously confused about
>> permissions for files on NTFS partitions.
>>> To me it seems clear that my failure to be able to
>>> create a new image must be directly related to the
>>> changes I made in my logical drive partitions.
>> Nope, its just got confused about file permissions that
>> changed when you change the logical drive partitions.
> That seems to be the key. However, I've only ever used
> one log on for this computer and it's been the same all
> along before and after changing the partitions,
I did too when I saw that problem when I used an NTFS
partition for the image files. Up till then I used a FAT32
partition for the image files and never saw a problem.
> so in that sense the permissions "should be" the same.
Its more complicated than that in practice. It appears to
be more of a problem with DI 2002 in the bug sense than
a fundamental problem with NTFS permissions. I didnt
really make that clear enough in my original comments.
> (BTW, to be clear, to initallly create and later to change
> the logical drives, I used the tools found in Control Panel/
> Administrative Tools/Computer Management/Disk Managment).
Yeah, that's the best place to do it and where I did it too.
> Even so, for whatever reason, I'm happy to accept as given that
> for some reason DI is confused about the permisssions as you say.
Yeah, it appears to be a bug/wart in DI.
I have also seen XP run out of slots too and had to
increase those when even explorer had a problem
with access to the files on that NTFS drive.
>>> (The primary partition has not been changed and
>>> remains the same throughout this whole ordeal).
>>> I know this is old software and I know symantec bought
>>> out powerquest (or at least drive image) some time ago.
>> Bought out powerquest.
> Okay, thanks for the clairification.
>>> Please help if you can even just by pointing me in the right
>>> direction. I feel like I must be missing something obvious.
>> Yes you are, the file permissions.
> Thanks for that insight!
>> You should be able to bypass the file permissions by booting
>> the DI 2002 floppys or CD and doing the restore from there.
>> You can create a bootable CD by saving an image directly to
>> the CD burner and then aborting that once the first CD is written.
>> Just use that for a bootable DI off CD and specify the image to
>> be restore manually browsing to the image files on the hard drive.
> Okay, I think I understand. Thanks! I really appreciate it. If
> I understand you right I should only have to create the boot
> CD once but then use that from now as a way to redirect to
> future hard drive images which will be different in the future.
Yes, its just a more convenient way to boot DI than the floppys.
> I'm assuming I'll have to follow that method from now on.
> I'll give that a try very soon and let you know how it turned out.
Yes, please, we dont get enough feedback on whether
a suggestion worked out the way it should do.
> Of course the obvious question is, is there a practical way of getting
> DI to recognize the new permissions? Perhaps by reinstalling DI?
> (I'm guessing it's just not that simple, right?)
I didnt look at that closely, I was rather irritated by
it showing its age in other areas, particularly network
support, and that was the last straw, I dont plan to
use it anymore, changed over to True Image now.
> Finally, if I was going to buy the newest Drive Image type
> software (mainly just to backup my OS partition) what
> would you suggest is the best choice on the market?
True Image in my opinion.
> Norton Ghost 2005 v9.0?
I dont like it at all. It does some ops fine, but it cant create an
image from the booted CD and that is a very serious lack for me.
I prefer to image a system that isnt mine before doing any work
on it for safety and need to be able to image from the booted CD.
Ghost 9 has to be installed before it will create an image and thats
very undesirable in that situation.
And its close to useless when migrating to a new hard drive.
Again, you cant do the cloning from the booted CD, you have
to do the cloning from the installed Ghost and that has very
real downsides with drive letters doing the cloning at the XP level.
You have to clone the partitions individually in that situation, and
it failed to clone one of my partitions, and was damned slow with
the one it did succeed. True Image cloned the entire drive in
much less time than Ghost took to do the one it manage to clone.
> Thanks again for your help Rod. I really was at
> a dead end for what to do until I read your post.
No problem, that's what these technical newsgroups are for.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: mydeadpresidents
- Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: mydeadpresidents
- Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- References:
- Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: mydeadpresidents
- Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- From: mydeadpresidents
- Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- Prev by Date: Re: paging file size
- Next by Date: Re: I hope parallel ports won't become obsolete
- Previous by thread: Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- Next by thread: Re: Help! Drive Image 2002 question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
