Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Martin Evans <mcenews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:41:45 +0100
"Eric Gisin" <ericgisin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Martin Evans" <mcenews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:qhfie1t84j4q88ctjfpm859u5hnjacrtib@xxxxxxxxxx
>> "Eric Gisin" <ericgisin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >Intel chipsets have never had com/lpt ports. The mainboard does.
>>
>> Errm, I think you better go and read motherboards 101 and see how com
>> and lpt ports interface to the internal bus and learn what an Intel
>> chipset is.
>>
>> Just a "for instance" to point you in the right direction, a
>> motherboard in front of me now has an Intel 82801FR I/O controller
>> hub, do you have an idea what it does?
>>
>I have the 82801BA and it certainly does NOT have com/lpt/fdc.
>
>Perhaps you should RTFM before spouting more bull***.
You specifically said "Intel chipsets have *NEVER* had com/lpt ports"
Yes, you definitely said NEVER
They have, they did, they still do (with some odd exceptions like the
half assed one you have)
--
.
- References:
- SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Lothar of the Hill People
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Lothar of the Hill People
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: J. Clarke
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Eric Gisin
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Martin Evans
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Eric Gisin
- SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Windows hangs after switching to SATA
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Next by thread: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Index(es):