Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: "Eric Gisin" <ericgisin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:52:42 -0700
"Martin Evans" <mcenews@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qhfie1t84j4q88ctjfpm859u5hnjacrtib@xxxxxxxxxx
> "Eric Gisin" <ericgisin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Intel chipsets have never had com/lpt ports. The mainboard does.
>
> Errm, I think you better go and read motherboards 101 and see how com
> and lpt ports interface to the internal bus and learn what an Intel
> chipset is.
>
> Just a "for instance" to point you in the right direction, a
> motherboard in front of me now has an Intel 82801FR I/O controller
> hub, do you have an idea what it does?
>
I have the 82801BA and it certainly does NOT have com/lpt/fdc.
Perhaps you should RTFM before spouting more bull***.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Martin Evans
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- References:
- SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Lothar of the Hill People
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Rod Speed
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Lothar of the Hill People
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: J. Clarke
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Eric Gisin
- Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- From: Martin Evans
- SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Next by Date: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Next by thread: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Index(es):