Re: Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- From: "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:50:48 +1000
Larry <LLppwhite@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been looking for information about USB 2.0 performance using
> external 5400 rpm 2-1/2" drives versus 4200. I'm inclinded to believe
> that there would be little difference in performance for backing up
> large images. Has anyone seen any info or had experience with this?
Really depends on what you use to create the images.
Most imaging apps dont produce the image at
anything like the thruput of the 4200 rpm drives.
.
- References:
- Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- From: Larry
- Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- Prev by Date: Re: Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- Next by Date: Re: SATA/IDE adapters and paging file performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- Next by thread: Re: Laptop Drives for USB 2.0 (4200 v. 5400)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|