Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: Arno Wagner <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Jul 2005 20:03:15 GMT
Previously TonyB <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arno Wagner <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Previously TonyB <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Arno Wagner <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>>> Irrelevant to whether it may well have happened in his case.
>> Huh? And why is that? Ever heard of statistics? Obviously not....
> Statistics are completely irrevant to what he has seen.
As I said...
>>> Most obviously with a sudden partial failure of the read
>>> electronics so say the read amplifier gain has gone bad.
>> Non-power electronics does very seldomly fail suddenly since
>> the tube days are over, unless operated seriously out of spec.
>> The typical pattern is allmost allways a slower degradation.
> Wrong. You still get sudden failures, most
> obviously if one of the bond wires comes off etc.
That would be a mechanical or electrical failure not an electronic
one.
Arno
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: J. Clarke
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: TonyB
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- References:
- Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: uclamathguy
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: TonyB
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: TonyB
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: Arno Wagner
- Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- From: TonyB
- Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- Prev by Date: Re: Summary of Recent Data Recovery Methods; Spinrite 5.0
- Next by Date: Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- Previous by thread: Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- Next by thread: Re: Seagate: Fine 1 day, bad the next
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|