Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Bill <bbaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:32:04 GMT
Franc Zabkar wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:19:51 GMT, Bill <bbaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> put finger<some snips>
to keyboard and composed:
Franc Zabkar wrote:Now
you appear to be saying that NICs *do* in fact have their own CPU,
Don't mis-quote me. How much processor do you think is on a generic $10 card? Not much.
Well, for $30 I can buy a DVD player with a PSU, case, VFD, DVD
loader, RAM, flash EEPROM, remote control, etc, etc. Within that
package is an MPEG4 capable decoder chip which probably has ten times
the processing power of a $10 NIC. So no, I wouldn't be surprised to
find that I could buy a Gigabit NIC for around $10.
I have an older 3C905 and it just appears to have a fancy ASIC on it.
Whether part of that is a processor is debatable. That card seems to show up more often than not.
butthat the more expensive ones have an additional co-processor to
support non-standard features such as hardware based security. If
that's the case, then it seems to me that you are bagging a Volkswagen
for not being a Porsche.
My comment on cheap junk on the MBs holds.AFAICT, a typical NIC that sells for about $10-15 has the exact same
hardware as what is on a motherboard (other than a boot ROM socket).
If it is $10-15 on a 10/100 NIC then it is probably less than $5 on parts on a motherboard. How cheap they can go, I do not know.
No Duh, Ralph.
That's why I was hinting at not using the el-cheapo or whatever crap they put in there and choose your NIC, same as a sound card or video.
I used to buy all my stereo equipment as components, too. If one thing blew out I didn't have to throw away a $2,000 stereo. Things always seem to break right after the warranty runs out. Different story!
- Franc ZabkarBill Baka
Remember that ***ANY*** load your CPU doesn't have to process makes more cycles available to you for your chosen program.
True, but whether this results in a significant reduction in CPU load
is something you need to test for yourself.
My cable runs up to 14M bps, so far, and may go faster if they would quit throttling it down to 7.75M bps.
Regardless, it seems to me that motherboard chipsets have come a long
way since last time you (or I) looked. Having said that, your
motherboard may be bottlenecked by a 100M bps PHY.
See http://www.nvidia.com/docs/IO/35382/nforce_amd_linecard.pdf
NVIDIA Native Gigabit Ethernet - The industry’s fastest Gigabit
Ethernet performance eliminates network bottlenecks and improves
overall system efficiency and performance
What bottlenecks? My NIC, router, and cable modem all run at 100M bps.
10 would be a bottleneck and 1G bps would be total overkill for a home setup. My daughter pulls her 802.11G at a consistent 54M bps wireless speed so she is not having a problem.
NVIDIA FirstPacket™ Technology - Assures your game data, VoIP
conversations, and large file transfers are delivered according to
your set preferences. Lowers your ping time for improved online gaming
NVIDIA DualNet® technology
Bzzt. I don't game. If I get a surplus of energy I just go out and run or ride my bicycle for the exercise. I never got the gaming bug, just the health nut bug.
- Two Gigabit Ethernet MACs with TCP/IP acceleration
- Teaming: allows two connections to work together to provide up to
twice the Ethernet bandwidth for large data transfers from file
servers to other PCs. It also provides network redundancy through
fail-over capability
For a busy office connection maybe.
TCP/IP Acceleration: - Delivers the highest system performance by
offloading CPU-intensive packet filtering tasks in hardware, providing
users with a fast networking environment
Checksum Offload - Improves networking efficiency by reducing CPU
utilization. Allows the processor to concentrate on other tasks
Jumbo Frame Support - Reduces the number of calls to the network
driver, thereby reducing CPU overhead and improves throughput
Windows Control Panel/Web-based Management - Provides easy access to
system set-up and configuration. Interface determined by software
version
IPv6 Support - Ability to future proof PC systems as standards evolve
- Franc Zabkar
Now I gotta go and do some reading to stay on the same page. I just bought the best I could get by walking into a Fry's Electronics and getting the best they had on the shelf.
If I can get some security and offloading before the CPU, that is just fine with me. I don't expect the NIC to be a cure all, but I have the router (WRT54G) set up to firewall the worst offenders from ever getting past, plus a few other functions. The NIC does the rest, and I have all kinds of anti-everything running and still only taking up about 550MB of my 2GB memory. Smooth enough that my cable modem and Comcast are now the weak links. The only (very marginal) slowdowns I have seen were when recoding super compressed Divx files to burn on a DVD, or recoding MP3's to somewhat less then 192 K bits for an old vinyl rip. Gets the up loader byte points but wastes my hard drive space.
Sum; I want the CPU as free as possible.
Reading coming soon here.
Bill Baka
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- References:
- Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Ellie
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Yousuf Khan
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Bill
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Bill
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Bill
- Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- From: Franc Zabkar
- Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- Prev by Date: Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- Next by Date: Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- Previous by thread: Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- Next by thread: Re: Onboard Realtek NIC - No lights?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|