Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Robert Redelmeier <redelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:44:44 GMT
keith <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm no expert either, but I don't see why one would close a
> page unnecessarily. Burst <> row or page. The *one* advantage
> of DRDRAM was *supposed* to be that multiple (as in many) pages
> could be kept open. I don't think SDRAM forces one to have a
> page open only when it's bing accessed. Even page-mode DRAM
> (what, 15 years ago?) didn't require pages to be closed after
> each access.
No, but there are delays (smaller on same row) and burst
length seems to be limited to 8:
http://www.eet.com/news/design/silicon/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=17408438&kc=6325
-- Robert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: keith
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- References:
- AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: magnate
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Felger Carbon
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: George Macdonald
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Felger Carbon
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Robert Redelmeier
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Robert Redelmeier
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: keith
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: Robert Redelmeier
- Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- From: keith
- AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- Prev by Date: Re: Intel cancels next-generation Xeon for even-more-next-generation Xeon
- Next by Date: Re: Intel bending the Centrino rules?
- Previous by thread: Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- Next by thread: Re: AMD CPUs in ASRock motherboards
- Index(es):