Re: 4 x DDR = Slower?
- From: Captin <UseLinkToEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2005 03:38:53 -0400
"" wrote:
> I just updated my old p4 3ghz with MSI 875P chipset from 1 to
> 2gb of
> memory. it had 2x512mb (PC3200 cas2) corsair twinx. now it has
> 4 of them.
>
> suddenly the BIOS reports the memory speed as 266 (133 DDR)
> instead of
> 400DDR (200DDR).
>
> take any of the two sets and its back to 400 again.
>
> anyone know why this would happen?
>
> Paul
You are not on your own with this issue. It makes me ask why these
companies bother making the motherboard with 4 DIMM slots in the first
place?
--
Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/Chips-DDR-Slower-ftopict61264.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=309272
.
- References:
- 4 x DDR = Slower?
- From: Paul Kelly
- 4 x DDR = Slower?
- Prev by Date: Memory errors on an Abit KR7A-133R
- Next by Date: Re: 4 x DDR = Slower?
- Previous by thread: Re: 4 x DDR = Slower?
- Next by thread: Re: Q: Tyan S1830S & PIII 1GHz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|